Canadian ports International Maritime Organization ship engine tier forecasts 2015-2050
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has established progressively more stringent diesel engine standards for oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions from ocean-going vessels (OGVs, or ships), which are based on a ship’s keel-laid date (KLD) and when a Nitrogen Emissions Control Area (NECA) comes into force. Ships built on or after specific KLD milestone dates are required to meet the engine standards in place at that time, and as a result, newer ships are significantly cleaner than older ones. Under IMO MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 13, if a ship undergoes a major conversion (involving the replacement of a marine diesel engine with a non-identical marine diesel engine), the standards at the time of replacement will apply. For a vessel transiting the North American NECA, the NOx Tier III standard would be applicable. Importantly, there are no further requirements for existing vessels to meet the more stringent engine standards nor are there requirements for shipping lines to deploy cleaner IMO Tier III vessels (existing or new builds) to a NECA. Thus, the actual emissions benefits remain uncertain without a better understanding of the four Canadian ports fleet engine mix, now and forecasted into the future. Using IHS Markit (third-party) activity data and ship parameter data, this report analyzes the current fleet composition with respect to IMO engine tiers calling four Canadian ports: Vancouver, Prince Rupert, Montréal, and Halifax. This report also forecasts how long the current world fleet can service future calls for each port before being exhausted and replaced by Tier III ships, which are ships with keels laid on or after 1 January 2016. These engines use aftertreatment technologies to meet an emission limit of 3.4 grams of NOx per kilowatt-hour or better, which are more than 90% cleaner with respect to NOx compared to Tier I ships. This report has identified the following: Just 0.5% of the 2019 ship calls to the four Canadian ports were IMO Tier III, a slower-than-expected deployment compared to previous generations of engines. Ship owners laid an unprecedented number of keels in 2015, leading up to and just prior to the Tier III deadline and many of these keels still have not been constructed. Since 2005, more than 1,000 keels laid still have not been built, and roughly 70% of these ships will be grandfathered from the Tier III standard. This backlog of pre-Tier III ships has delayed deployment of the cleanest Tier III vessels. A scenario forecast found that for the four Canadian ports and associated vessel types, Tier III ships are not expected to comprise a substantial part of the fleet until the mid- to late-2040s with the earliest dates in the mid-2030s for only a few vessel types. This report also has identified significant challenges with using third-party data, rather than data from ports themselves, to conduct such analyses and recommends further study with port-specific call data and vessel forecasts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».