Programme de surveillance des sables bitumineux : rapport annuel 2023-2024
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Since February 2012, the governments of Canada and Alberta have worked as partners to implement and jointly manage the Oil Sands Monitoring (OSM) Program. The program strives to improve the characterization of the condition of the environment and enhance understanding of the cumulative effects of oil sands development activities in the oil sands area of Alberta. To ensure that the program is responsive to multiple knowledge sources, emerging priorities, and input from Indigenous communities and key stakeholders, program implementation has taken an adaptive approach in building on existing monitoring. The annual monitoring activities are determined through the program’s governance structure within a consensus based decision-making process, and reflects input, perspectives, and concerns from representatives of Indigenous communities, government, industry, and key stakeholders (Appendix A). For 2023-24, the work planning process resulted in the OSM Program Co-Chairs approving funding in the amount of $55,235,189 for 37 projects to support the delivery of monitoring, evaluation, and reporting activities. In total, the 37 work plans approved resulted in 302 deliverables. The approved budget includes up to $50 million in industry billing by the Oil Sands Environmental Monitoring Program Regulation. The actual expenditure incurred in 2023-24 was $46,736,955 with a total of $8,498,234 reported as underspent against the total work plan budget. A cumulative total for the period from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2024 of $18,029,964 was held as unspent revenue for the OSM Program. Reported variances were largely due to multiple factors such as delays in project leads receiving funding notifications, delays in setting up non-standard contracts, supply chain issues, managing staff transitions, hiring challenges and delays, funding condition deadlines not being met, contracts not being successfully executed, procurement delays, limited air charter availability and compressed field and sampling activities owing to wildfires, deferred community engagement and training and the consolidation of some activities resulting in efficiencies gained. From 2012 to the end of the 2023-24 reporting period, the program’s evaluation and reporting efforts have yielded over 1,000 products reporting on the condition of the environment in the oil sands region of Alberta, specifically in relation to potential impacts of oil sands development. These include peer-reviewed papers, technical reports, program reports, presentations, and workshop materials. A full list of the 86 publications in 2023-24 are presented in Appendix C. Alberta and Canada recognize that the monitoring, evaluation, and reporting outputs of the OSM Program inform multiple needs and is a responsibility that has long-term implications. Both governments remain committed to working with all OSM Program participants to continue implementing a robust and scientifically credible monitoring program for the oil sands that is inclusive, collaborative, and adaptive.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».