MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7133281898

Environmental and indirect human health risk assessment of GloFish® Pristella Tetras : transgenic ornamental fishes

2024· other· en· W7133281898 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Notice bibliographique

RevueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2024
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRisk assessmentHazardEnvironmental hazardHuman healthHazard analysisEnvironmental impact assessmentClimate changeBrackish waterTrophic level
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), four notifications were submitted under the New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms) (NSNR[O]) by Spectrum Brands to Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) for genetically engineered Pristella Tetras: GloFish® Electric Green® (GPM2021), Starfire Red® (RPM2022), Sunburst Orange® (OPM2021), and Galactic Purple® (PPM2021) Pristella Tetra. Environmental and indirect human health risk assessments were conducted that included an analysis of potential hazards, likelihoods of exposure, and associated uncertainties to reach conclusions on risk and to provide science advice to ECCC and Health Canada (HC) to inform their CEPA risk assessment. Assessments were compared with the assessments of previously notified GloFish® Tetra, Danio, Betta, and Barb lines. Environmental Risk Assessment The environmental exposure assessment concluded that the occurrence of GPM2021, RPM2022, OPM2021, and PPM2021 in the Canadian environment, outside of aquaria, is expected to be rare, isolated, and ephemeral due to their inability to survive typical low winter temperatures in Canada’s freshwater and brackish environments. Consequently, the likelihood of exposure of GPM2021, RPM2022, OPM2021, and PPM2021 to the Canadian environment is ranked low. The uncertainty associated with this environmental exposure estimation is low, given the available data for temperature tolerance of the notified lines and relevant comparators and the lack of establishment through the long history of use of non-transgenic P. maxillaris in North America. The environmental hazard assessment concluded that the hazards of GPM2021, RPM2022, OPM2021, and PPM2021 associated with environmental toxicity, trophic interactions, hybridization, disease transmission, biodiversity, biogeochemical cycling, and habitat are negligible. There is low hazard associated with horizontal gene transfer. The uncertainty levels associated with the environmental hazard ratings range from negligible to moderate due to data limitations for the notified and surrogate organisms, and some reliance on expert opinion and anecdotal evidence. There is low risk of adverse environmental effects at the exposure levels predicted for the Canadian environment from the use of GPM2021, RPM2022, OPM2021, and PPM2021 for use as ornamental aquarium fish or other potential uses. Indirect Human Health Risk Assessment The indirect human health (IHH) exposure assessment concluded that human exposure potential of GPM2021, RPM2022, OPM2021, and PPM2021 is low to medium. Their intended use is in the ornamental aquarium trade, thus largely limiting public exposure to those individuals who possess them for use in home aquaria, potentially including vulnerable individuals. Uncertainty associated with the IHH exposure assessment is moderate due to limited information regarding future import quantities, market uptake, and exposure scenarios in Canada. The IHH hazard assessment concluded that the indirect human hazard potential of GPM2021, RPM2022, OPM2021, and PPM2021 is low. There are no reported cases of zoonotic infections associated with the other commercially available GloFish® lines or wild-type P. maxillaris arising from aquarium use. There is no indication that the inserted genetic material is associated with any toxicity, allergenicity, or pathogenicity in humans. Uncertainty associated with the IHH hazard assessment is low. This is based on available data about the organisms, and information from the literature about non-transgenic P. maxillaris and other ornamental aquarium fishes. The history of use of all commercially available GloFish® lines and non-transgenic P. maxillaris in Canada and other countries further supports this assessment. There is a low risk of adverse indirect human health effects at the exposure levels predicted for the Canadian population from the use of GPM2021, RPM2022, OPM2021, and PPM2021 as ornamental aquarium fish or other potential uses. Conclusion and Summary Overall, GPM2021, RPM2022, OPM2021, and PPM2021 imported for aquarium use pose a low risk to the Canadian environment and to the indirect human health of Canadians. Although there was moderate uncertainty associated with some of the assessment components, these do not affect confidence in the overall risk ratings. Assessment conclusions of the notified lines of GloFish® Pristella Tetra were consistent with those for the GloFish® Tetras, Danios, Bettas, and Barbs.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,068
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,136

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→Travaux en français237 207→