Application of Management Procedure Framework for Outside Quillback Rockfish
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The outside stock of Quillback Rockfish (Sebastes maliger, Outside Quillback Rockfish) occurs in all coastal waters outside of Groundfish Management Area 4B in British Columbia (BC). This analysis provides scientific advice for the sustainable management of Outside Quillback Rockfish consistent with the Precautionary Approach (PA) Policy through application of the Management Procedure (MP) Framework developed for BC groundfishes (Anderson et al. 2021). The MP Framework evaluates the performance of MPs across alternative plausible states of nature explored in different Operating Models (OMs). The stock status was evaluated with regards to a Limit Reference Point (LRP) and Upper Stock Reference (USR) of 0.4 BMSY and 0.8 BMSY, respectively. The 2021 spawning biomass was estimated to be 189% of BMSY (standard deviation (SD) = 13%), and above both the LRP and USR with a 99% probability, averaged across three reference OMs. Since the current stock biomass is estimated to be above the LRP, the conservation objectives are to maintain the stock: (1) above the LRP during two generations (54 years) with a minimum probability of 75%, (2) above the USR with a minimum probability of 50%; and to (3) maintain fishing mortality below the removal reference, i.e., FMSY, with a minimum probability of 50%. Other objectives include maintaining fishery access and catch. These objectives follow strategic objectives identified in workshops held in 2021 (see Haggarty et al. 2022). The generation time was estimated to be 27 years, based on the natural mortality value of 0.056 and 50% female maturity at 9.4 years. Natural mortality is based on the maximum observed age of 95 years. Since the previous assessment, the relationship between natural mortality and maximum observed age has been updated based on meta-analyses in the scientific literature. Five total OMs were explored. Three reference OMs differ in values of mean natural mortality (M) and the assumption that recreational catch is lower than estimates from the Internet Recreational Effort and Catch (iREC) survey. Two robustness OMs include an OM with lower steepness (h), and an OM that assumes lower average future recruitment. Environmental conditions affecting stock dynamics were considered with the alternative values of natural mortality, steepness, and lower recruitment OMs. Our understanding of the environment and stock productivity is not sufficient to model these relationships mechanistically. The Management Procedures (MPs) evaluated included three constant catch MPs, eight MPs based on an index of survey abundance, and a “no fishing” and “fishing at FMSY” reference MP. All MPs (except one of the constant catch MPs, which did not meet the removal reference criterion) met all three conservation objectives under the OM reference set scenarios. Among the set of satisficed MPs, there is a trade-off between long-term biomass levels and long-term catches. While the MPs varied in the levels of long term catch, all maintained a high to very high probability of staying above the LRP and USR during the projections. The index-based management procedures were implemented biennially in the projections because the hard bottom longline (HBLL) survey requires two years to sample the full area. As such, catch advice from the index-based MPs can only be updated every two years. Exceptional circumstances that would trigger a re-evaluation of the OMs will be reviewed using the survey index, age and size-structure, and life history parameters. These data are presented in the Groundfish (GF) Synopsis report (e.g., DFO 2022).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».