MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7133283824

Science Response : WCVI Pacific Cod status update in 2023

2024· other· en· W7133283824 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Notice bibliographique

RevueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2024
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndex (typography)Stock (firearms)Stock assessmentPacific oceanCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Schedule
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The 2020 assessment for Pacific Cod (Gadus macrocephalus) in British Columbia (BC) found the Area 3CD stock (West Coast Vancouver Island: WCVI; Figure 1) to be in the Cautious Zone with 97–98% probability, with 2–10% probability of being in the Critical Zone, over all catch scenarios considered (DFO 2021). This followed a notable reduction in the 2018 WCVI synoptic bottom trawl survey index (approximately 26–27% of the 2014 and 2016 observations (Table 1; Figure 2)). Given the low index point in 2018, the 2020 Science Response recommended updating the assessment following the 2020 WCVI synoptic bottom trawl survey. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the scheduled 2020 WCVI survey was postponed to 2021, returning to its regular biennial schedule in 2022. Both the 2021 and 2022 index points were lower than the 2018 observation (Table 1). Catches since 2018 have also been lower than in previous years (Table 2; Figure 3). The commercial catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) index decreased substantially in 2018 but has since increased, following increases in commercial catch (Figure 4). A Request for Science Information and Advice (RSIA) for Pacific Cod was issued in 2022 for both the 3CD and 5ABCD (Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound) stocks. The stock assessment model (see Analysis and Response) is fitted to commercial and survey indices of abundance, commercial catch, and an index of mean weight, derived from commercial length samples (Forrest et al. 2020). However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and a subsequent shift towards at-sea electronic monitoring, there has been no at-sea biological sampling on commercial trawl vessels since 2019. This change follows a trend of reduced biological length sampling of Pacific Cod on commercial vessels that began around 2015 (Appendix A). The 2022 RSIA therefore had two steps: 1) an assessment of the potential sensitivity of the stock assessment to missing length data from the commercial fishery; and 2) a stock status update with updated catch advice for both stocks. The RSIA advised to only proceed to Step 2 if the missing length data were “deemed to not be of significance to the quality and rigour of the scientific advice”. Using the 2020 assessment model, the authors presented several sensitivity analyses to the Pacific Cod Technical Working Group (TWG) to evaluate alternative methods for updating the commercial mean weight index. This included a generalized linear model (GLM) for predicting the commercial mean weight index from a survey mean weight index derived from WCVI survey samples. The TWG found that the GLM provided acceptable predictions of the commercial mean weight index for the Area 3CD stock. However, the TWG decided that a similar GLM applied to the 5ABCD stock did not produce predictions consistent enough with the commercial mean weight index in overlapping years to be used in an assessment. Because of this issue with the 5ABCD commercial mean weight index and limited staff resources, Step 2 did not proceed. The Pacific Groundfish Management Unit has not requested updated catch advice for 2023. However, given the three low index points in 2018, 2021, and 2022, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Science Branch has issued a RSIA requesting a stock status update for the Area 3CD stock to ensure all three of these index points are considered in a timely evaluation of stock status. While the last assessment found that there was low probability (2%–10%) of the stock falling below its limit reference point (LRP) in 2022 under all considered catch scenarios (DFO 2021), the stock has failed to rebound under low estimated fishing mortality rates. The Fish Stocks provisions (FSP) of Canada’s Fisheries Act require that a rebuilding plan be developed for major fish stocks that have declined to or below their LRP. While the FSP only apply to major stocks prescribed in the Fishery (General) Regulations, guidance has been provided that states that, for stocks not subject to the FSP (such as Pacific Cod), DFO’s Precautionary Approach (PA) Policy (DFO 2009) still applies: “[. . . ] under the [PA] policy, the requirement to develop a rebuilding plan is triggered once the stock declines to, or below, its LRP. However, in keeping with the 2009 PA Policy, if a fish stock is decreasing and approaching the LRP, management measures must encourage stock growth and arrest preventable declines, and the development of a rebuilding plan should be initiated sufficiently in advance to ensure that the plan is ready to be implemented if a stock declines to its LRP.” For the purpose of triggering a rebuilding plan, the guidance provides the following definitions of whether a stock is at or below its LRP: “[A stock] is considered to be at or below its LRP if the terminal year stock status indicator is estimated to be at or below the LRP with a greater than 50% probability or if the projected stock status indicator falls below the LRP with a greater than 50% probability under a zero catch scenario in a 1-year projection, unless an alternative method or probability is defined in a stock specific precautionary approach framework.” This Science Response reports results from the regional peer review of October 20, 2023, on the Status Update of Pacific Cod (Gadus macrocephalus) for West Coast Vancouver Island in 2023. Since there has been no request for catch advice, this is a stock status update only. The update uses the same model configurations as the 2018 and 2020 assessments (Forrest et al. 2020; DFO 2021), including model-averaged stock status based on the same seven sensitivity scenarios as in 2018 and 2020. Due to the ongoing absence of commercial length samples, this update uses the GLM developed in 2022 to update the last five years of the annual commercial mean weight index, based on values from a new survey mean weight index. The survey mean weight index and the GLM are described in Appendices B and C.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,918
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,162

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,018
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0370,024

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaTravaux en français237 207