MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7133286082

Science response : refining candidate critical habitat for White Sturgeon, UCR population

2024· other· en· W7133286082 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Notice bibliographique

RevueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2024
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesFisheries and Oceans CanadaBC Hydro
Mots-clésSturgeonHabitatEndangered speciesWildlifePopulationCritical habitatFish migrationWhite (mutation)FloodplainFlood myth
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In Canada, White Sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) is found in rivers and lakes within the Fraser, Nechako, Columbia, and Kootenay river systems in British Columbia (BC). White Sturgeon is the largest (max length 6.10 m) freshwater fish species in Canada, with a lifespan that can exceed 100 years (Scott and Crossman 1998; McPhail 2007). The Upper Columbia River population of White Sturgeon is a designatable unit (DU) recognized as at-risk by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Recovery of the White Sturgeon, Upper Columbia River population or DU, is impeded by recruitment failure due to habitat changes, predominantly related to dams and river regulation (DFO 2014, 2023a; McAdam 2015). Other threats include direct and indirect alterations to habitat (e.g., instream activities; development of riparian, foreshore, and floodplain areas), incidental mortality, and ecosystem changes (e.g., invasive species; Hatfield et al. 2013; DFO 2014, 2023a). Recovery efforts for White Sturgeon in the Upper Columbia River began in 2000 with the establishment of the Upper Columbia White Sturgeon Recovery Initiative (UCWSRI), a coordinated transboundary Technical Working Group (TWG) formed to provide scientific advice, to develop plans to guide recovery of the species, and to oversee implementation and monitoring of these plans in cooperation with the responsible agencies. Albeit not being official documents under the Species at Risk Act (SARA 2002) in Canada, the UCWSRI TWG developed the original recovery plan in 2002, updated in 2012 (Hildebrand and Parsley 2013), which provides broad recovery objectives covering both the Canadian and United States (US) portions of the recovery area. In Canada, White Sturgeon were assessed by COSEWIC as six nationally significant populations in 2003, with the Upper Columbia River DU of White Sturgeon assessed as Endangered. This COSEWIC (2003) assessment subsequently led to the White Sturgeon, Upper Columbia River population, being listed under Schedule 1 of SARA as Endangered in 2006. In 2012, the COSEWIC reassessment revised the population structure and identified four White Sturgeon DUs and again assessed the Upper Columbia River DU as Endangered (COSEWIC 2013). Following the SARA listing in 2006, a federal Recovery Strategy (DFO 2014, 2023a) was produced that identified White Sturgeon critical habitat. Critical habitat is defined in SARA as “…the habitat that is necessary for the survival or recovery of a listed wildlife species and that is identified as the species’ critical habitat in a recovery strategy or in an action plan for the species” [s. 2(1)]. Under SARA S.41.1(c) a species’ critical habitat must be identified “…to the extent possible, based on the best available information, including the information provided by COSEWIC, and examples of activities that are likely to result in its destruction.” At the time of original critical habitat identification for White Sturgeon, spawning within the Kinnaird reach (downstream of the Kootenay-Columbia River confluence) had only recently been detected and therefore evidence was deemed insufficient to support its inclusion as critical habitat. Nevertheless, the White Sturgeon Recovery Strategy (DFO 2014, 2023a), Action Plan (DFO 2023b), and Hatfield et al. (2013), assessed the Kinnaird reach of the Columbia River as important habitat since spawning had been recently observed. In line with the recommended schedule of studies in the recovery strategy (DFO 2014, 2023a), research and monitoring efforts on White Sturgeon in the Kinnaird reach of the Columbia River have increased, and the area appears to support all life stages (BC Hydro 2023a, 2023b). Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Species at Risk Program has requested science advice to support the refinement of additional candidate critical habitat for White Sturgeon, Upper Columbia River population, using data from recent monitoring efforts in the Kinnaird reach. The assessment and advice arising from this Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Science Response process will be used by the Species at Risk Program to ensure critical habitat is properly identified to the greatest extent possible and protected for White Sturgeon, Upper Columbia River population. Existing critical habitats for the DU are not being considered in this review. The specific objectives of this review are to: 1. Review information available from the Kinnaird reach on the habitat necessary for survival and recovery of White Sturgeon, Upper Columbia River population. 2. Update the functions, features, and attributes of the habitat across life stages. 3. Present updated candidate critical habitat spatial attributes for the Kinnaird reach. This Science Response Report results from the January 11, 2024 regional peer review on the Information for Refining Candidate Critical Habitat for White Sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus), Upper Columbia River Population.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,535
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,935

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0030,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaTravaux en français237 207