Science on the use of timing windows as a mitigation measure
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Timing windows refer to a mitigation measure that defines low-risk periods for harm to fish and fish habitat from works, undertaking and activities (WUAs). The Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program (FFHPP) has requested scientific advice on the use of timing windows. To address this request, this document is structured around three main objectives outlined in the terms of reference. First, a literature search was conducted, and found that there is a paucity of peer reviewed scientific research connected to timing windows, and that literature on timing windows is dominated by material on dredging activities. An in-depth treatment of rationale, effectiveness, and frameworks for timing windows is provided. Canadian timing window use, rationale, and considerations varies among provinces and territories, but spawning is often cited as the fish life process targeted for protection. Second, a conceptual model outlines a set of rationale and considerations for the creation or modification of timing windows focusing on (1) the timing and vulnerability of fish life processes, (2) the characteristics of WUAs and associated pressures, and (3) the characteristics of habitat and environmental conditions. Importantly, life processes vary in their vulnerability to WUAs, but characteristics such as well-defined and predictable timing were identified among the factors that make some more suitable to mitigation with timing windows than others. Further considerations for migration, spawning, feeding, natal, rearing and refuge use are also presented. Characteristics of WUA pressures, including timing and persistence, were also identified as key factors for timing windows to consider. The interaction of pressures with fish habitat will be influenced by characteristics of the habitat and the environmental context. Protecting habitat processes with timing windows will depend on the process predictability, the mechanisms that regulate the WUA pressure and the habitat process, and the degree of overlap and strength of the pressure during exposure. Finally, we present a three-tiered approach to evaluate the effectiveness of timing windows to reduce the risk of exposure of fish life or habitat processes, the effects of pressures on the exposed process, and risk at the population level. Studies at each tier can inform comparisons of how risk varies through time, which is a key consideration when choosing among timing window options. This document advances the state of knowledge on the use of timing windows and on evaluating their effectiveness. The information presented can be used by FFHPP in the development of a science-based timing window framework to guide their creation and modification, to aid practitioners to identify potential risks of WUAs outside of established windows, and to inform their adaptation to changing environmental conditions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,037 | 0,099 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».