The University of British Columbia Food Systems Project (UBCFSP) : scenario 2
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This report summarizes the research done by Group 27 for the 2008 University of British Columbia Food Systems Project. This community based action research project was a collaborative effort between the UBC students and staff, the Alma Mater Society Food and Beverage Department (AMSFBD), the Alma Mater Society Sustainability Coordinator, the University of Guelph Hospitality Services and two of the AMSFBD’s produce suppliers. It was conducted by undergraduate students with the help of the teaching team in the Faculty of Land and Food Systems, and other stakeholders involved in the effort to make the UBC food system more sustainable. The purpose of this investigation was to determine: (a) the scope of the existing AMSFBD’s sustainable food procurement policies, (b) what is being done to increase sustainable food procurement elsewhere, and (c) what potential areas exist for improvement at UBC. This research was initiated by the drafting of the AMS Lighter Footprint Strategy (AMSLFS) with the goal of having specific targets developed for less ecologically damaging food procurement. We chose to focus on local, namely BC-based food sources, to achieve these ends. Our methods included using “A Guide to Developing a Sustainable Food Purchasing Policy” as a model for target development and collecting data through literature reviews, interviews and email correspondences with stakeholders. We learned from the University of Guelph Hospitality Services that having one’s own vehicle increases sourcing options. The challenges to sourcing local at the AMS include an overworked staff, time constraints, poor storage options for local produce, financial responsibilities to students and the need for transportation options. Challenges to sourcing local for suppliers include BC’s climate, competitive pricing, handling convenience of produce for customers and having their quality standards met. Our findings indicate that subsequent targets for the AMSFBD include (a) defining their parameters of the term ‘local’, (b) publicly recognizing that mushrooms are 100% BC grown, (c) implementing an electronic tracking system to help establish a baseline and (d) consistently expressing the desire to purchase local products when in dialogue with suppliers. The recommended next steps include developing an action plan, an evaluation system for the listed targets, and increasing the transparency of the purchasing system at UBC. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».