MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7134663228

Yeats Eliot Review

2002· article· W7134663228 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. French

Notice bibliographique

RevueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · 2002
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueModernist Literature and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiographyInnocenceGirlImmortalityPraiseCharacter (mathematics)Allegory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Unlike her more famous mother, Iseult Gonne seems actively to have sought the supporting role of muse, which is of course one reason why she has never had a biography of her own.Even with that willingness, she never gained the kind of immortality Maud Gonne did through Yeats's poetry--yet the history of Iseult's relationship with the poet is interesting.Yeats had a front-row seat for Iseult's maturation, and evidently perceived her in several ways over the course of her life: as an archetype of the compromised innocence of childhood, as a mirror image of Maud, and as the quintessence of wasted potential.Almost all published descriptions of Iseult Gonne portray her less as a personality than as an embodiment of some abstraction, some constant companion to other, more vivid human lives.This quality of her character--or perhaps of her fate--is somehow emblematized in the story of her conception.In 1890, Maud Gonne had a son with the French journalist and agitator Lucien Millevoye.The child died a year later. 1 Yeats wrote in his autobiography that "The idea came to her that the lost child might be reborn, and she had gone back to Millevoye, in the vault under the memorial chapel.A girl child was born, now two years old" (Memoirs 133).Yeats both doubted and disapproved, but to Maud Iseult at first represented the child she had lost.Although her date of birth is misreported as 1895 in Nancy Cardozo's biography of Maud Gonne, and in the index to Yeats's Memoirs, Iseult was actually born on August 6, 1894 (Balliett 29).She was educated at a Carmelite convent in France, in Laval, but was probably never as innocent as that fact might sentimentally imply.For one thing, she was almost certainly aware from the beginning of her illegitimacy.Although Maud passed her off to the respectable world at large as her niece--or, as in her autobiography, A Servant of the Queen, as "a charming child I French 2 had adopted" (Servant 296)--Iseult was known to be Maud Gonne's natural daughter by a great many people.Many Dubliners suspected that Yeats was the father, but Iseult herself was acquainted with Lucien Millevoye and knew that he was her father. 2Discussing Maud Gonne's life circa 1900, Nancy Cardozo writes that "Iseult was aware that Millevoye, who came for a visit now and then with gifts and a kiss, was her father.Later she considered him licentious, vaguely threatening" (197).When and why Iseult vouchsafed this opinion of her father Cardozo does not say, but it is interesting to note that there were at least two intimidating father figures in Iseult's childhood--another factor mitigating against innocence.John MacBride, too, was a disturbingly unstable father figure.Shortly after severing her connection with Lucien Millevoye, Maud met and then toured the United States with Major John MacBride, veteran of the war in South Africa and exile from Ireland.Maud married him on February 21, 1903 (Cardozo 229).Maud later asserted that Iseult, eight years old at the time, had immediately disliked MacBride: "She was such a beautiful and such a strangely wise child.She had cried when I told her I was getting married to MacBride and said she hated MacBride.I had felt like crying, too.I told her I would send her lovely things from Spain, where we were going for our honeymoon, but she was not consoled" (Servant 348).This story, from Maud's 1938 autobiography, is very probably inflected with all the retrospective prophecy of hindsight, for Maud's marriage to MacBride had ended in a nasty and very public separation in 1905.In her petition for divorce, Maud had charged MacBride with intemperance and cruelty, and worse.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,448
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1200,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech)Même sujetModernist Literature and CriticismTravaux en français237 207