MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7134719987

Social Work Students & Faculty Travel to Winnipeg to Learn about International Human Rights

2015· article· W7134719987 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alyssa Walker

Notice bibliographique

RevueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) · 2015
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocial Work Education and Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHuman rightsDenialSocial workHuman rights educationInternational human rights lawAmnestyPoliticsChina
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Amnesty International defines human rights as “basic rights and freedoms that all people are entitled to regardless of nationality, sex, national or ethnic origin, race, religion, language, or other status. Human rights include civil and political rights.” On October 27th, a group of 24 social work students and faculty visited the Canadian Museum for Human Rights in Winnipeg, MB to learn the stories of those who have experienced the denial of basic human rights throughout Canada and the world. While at the museum, students spent the morning visiting the various exhibits and galleries including, “What are Human Rights,” Examining the Holocaust,” “Breaking the Silence,” and “indigenous Perspectives.” The galleries include multimedia shows, giant panoramic screens, art, and artifacts that described various aspects of human rights. Students enjoyed viewing the exhibits and learning about international human rights while also understanding the important role of social workers in promoting the rights of everyone. Student, Bailey Kitko stated, “The museum built long walkways between each exhibit to encourage reflection and formation of ideas on human rights. [The reflection time] made me more aware of human rights issues and made me realize, as a social work student, how important it is to advocate for oppressed people around the world.” At the end of the day, the faculty and students attended a presentation by Dr. Maria Cheung, Associate Professor of Social Work at the University of Manitoba, about her research on China and forced organ harvesting. Dr. Cheung informed the group about the execution and involuntary donation of organs from Chinese prisoners, particularly those who are imprisoned for practicing the traditional Chinese meditative practice of Falun Gong. Many governmental groups, including the Canadian government, and the group, Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting (DAFOH), are working to raise awareness of this crime against humanity and force the Chinese government to end this practice. Students and faculty were unaware of forced organ harvesting prior to their trip, and were shocked to learn that individuals all over the world, including the United States, might receive a needed organ transplant “harvested” from a Chinese political prisoner. The students were moved to ask if they might do something jointly with the social work students at the University of Manitoba to support them in raising awareness about this issue, and their social work club president enthusiastically agreed to help explore ways for our students to work together. Barb Kramer, Assistant Professor of Social Work, and lead organizer of the trip, stated, “The trip was a great experience to help students understand Social Work issues on an international level.” For some students, the trip to Winnipeg was their first opportunity to travel outside of the United States. Being able to experience going through Customs, the changes in signs from English to French, and the variances in culture were all new and beneficial experiences for them. Another benefit of the trip was that students and faculty were able to spend quality time together outside of the classroom. Not only did students engage in dialogue with their professors about human rights issues, but they also got to know them on a more personal level. Student, Jenna DeSmidt summed up the trip when she said, “It was an unforgettable experience because we got the opportunity to learn outside of the classroom while also connecting/networking with our fellow Social Work classmates and professors.” Source: Amnesty International (2015). Human Rights Basics. Retrieved from http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/human-rights-basics

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,513
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,969

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0270,003
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1970,031

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,095
Tête enseignante GPT0,378
Écart entre enseignants0,283 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)Même sujetSocial Work Education and PracticeTravaux en français237 207