Social markers of acculturation : building a shared understanding in Japan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Social Markers of Acculturation: Building a Shared Understanding in Japan Using the Keio Grant for the Development of Academic Research, my research about Social Markers of Acculturation ("SMA") has advanced in two ways: 1. First, I completed an academic paper about which SMA Japanese people expect immigrants to master to be socially accepted in Japanese society and workplaces. 2. Second, I could develop and test a quantitative measure of acceptance in Japanese society and workplaces for migrants in Japan. For #1 above, I completed a paper, "Constructing Who Can Be Japanese: A Study of Social Markers of Acceptance in Japan" which is now being reviewed for publication in an international journal. I presented this research at the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology's 24th International Congress, held at the University of Guelph in Guelph, Canada (July 2, 2018). This paper was delivered as part of a symposium, for which I was the chairperson, entitled, "Social Markers of Acculturation: The Accessibility and Process of Gaining Host Culture Acceptance for Immigrants in Five Nations." Based on the strength of this research, I have been invited to serve as the co-editor of a special edition of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations (published by Elsevier) to be published sometime in 2019, which will be devoted to research related to social markers of acceptance for immigrant populations around the world. For #2 above, I finished a paper, "A New Framework of Workplace Acculturation: The Need to Belong and Constructing Ontological Interpretive Spaces," which was accepted for publication in the journal Intercultural Communication for the July, 2018 issue. I presented this research at Ritsumeikan University's College of Business Administration (November 1, 2018) in a talk entitled, "National Group and Organizational Belonging: A New Framework for Successful Intercultural Communication in Business." Also, I recruited participants for a quantitative study to establish the validity and reliability of a survey designed to measure the two dimensions in my theoretical framework. Approximately 200 people have taken the survey so far, and I am continuing to recruit new participants to increase the reliability of the survey results. I have decided to use all of my budget of 200,000 yen to pay for the IACCP 24th International Congress at Guelph University because the costs of attending the conference exceeded the amount of this Keio Grant for the Development of Academic Research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».