Meeting Demands for Animal Health: Veterinary Medicine in Rural Southern Ontario, 1862-1939
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation examines animal healthcare in rural southern Ontario from 1862, when animal health lectures were first delivered, to 1939, when the Canadian Army Veterinary Corps disbanded in the lead-up to the Second World War. By examining farmers’ access to experiential knowledge and veterinary services in southern Ontario, a region known at the time for its significant contributions to both experiential and institutional knowledge production, this dissertation charts the evolution of veterinary knowledge and the friction that developed between informal, experiential practitioners and a new generation of doctors in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. During this period, the development of the veterinary profession was non-linear, and the lines between experiential knowledge and institutional knowledge were blurry. Significant changes occurred in animal–human relationships and livestock healthcare practices, with farmers, experiential practitioners, and professional veterinarians all contributing to this transformation. The veterinary profession developed in response to demands for its services, adapting to the needs of both livestock owners and state officials, as well as to social, cultural, and economic drivers. The slow and inconsistent transition from practical, experiential knowledge to professional, institutional knowledge was in part driven by the demand for processes that supported public health regulations and food safety. This shift occurred in the late nineteenth century, when Ontario farmers began concentrating on livestock farming and industrializing their farming practices. Increasing urbanization also affected the development of animal healthcare practices. As urbanization progressed, milk deliveries increased and horses were used for urban transportation as tractors replaced horses in farmers’ fields. This transition occurred during a time when the pure milk movement led consumers to demand pasteurization, an expensive industrial process that required substantial capital investments. Increasing investment in industrial farming and growing concerns over the spread of zoonotic diseases among humans and animals led the state to work with the Ontario Veterinary College (OVC) to implement training courses for dairy and meat inspectors who were tasked with enforcing public health regulations. OVC prioritized government demand for veterinary services over the burgeoning animal welfare movement in the early twentieth century and interwar period. The decision to focus on livestock healthcare over small animal medicine reflected the profession’s view of the connections among upper-class women, small companion animals, and animal welfare movements increasingly concerned with the well-being of pets. The veterinary profession advocated for stricter legislation to cement its authority in the face of competition from experiential practitioners. However, during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the distinction between “folk medicine” and institutional knowledge of veterinary pharmacology was not entirely clear. Instead, professional veterinarians often used similar remedies as those used by experiential practitioners. As legislation increasingly marginalized experiential practitioners, OVC developed extension services that provided farmers and private-practice veterinarians with access to its clinics and laboratories. However, at the same time, OVC also required specimens and blood samples to comply with the scientific principles that guided their research and experiments on animals living in OVC’s barns or on farms across southern Ontario. This research reveals how connections between experiential animal healthcare practitioners, farmers, veterinarians, and the state in southern Ontario shaped the evolution of animal health practices and the development of veterinary medicine.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».