How to build resilient communities? The Chilean Environmental Observatory as an interdisciplinary research case driven by systemic design to empower through information
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Faced with the climate crisis scenario, it is urgent to take action for local, sustainable and resilient community development, such as the collaboration of multiple actors from civil society and the private and public sectors. In that regard, public environmental information on environmental management and the performance of the mining industry is key to reducing socio-environmental conflicts and supporting decision-making, especially for citizens who are on constant alert in the face of the climate crisis. Recognising this problem, a multidisciplinary research team from the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile developed the Environmental Observatory (EO), an environmental management information system pilot focused on mining projects in two regions of Chile. The purpose of the EO is to improve access to information for resilient community action to respond to environmental crisis contexts and avoid the generation of environmental conflicts due to lack of information, lack of transparency in environmental management processes and distrust associated with the control of the mining industry. Today, access to this kind of information in Chile has weaknesses linked to the institutional dispersion of data, asymmetries of access to information by different actors and the scarce consideration of the capacities, needs and expectations of each type of actor involved in a territory’s environmental management. The wicked problems approach, visual thinking, sense-making, and sense-sharing processes to make tacit knowledge explicit are key processes that break down the problem into components, enabling their understanding and integrating them into a solution proposal. Based on this, it is possible to involve and allow citizens to take part in the governance of processes from a strategic and political perspective, moving towards a new understanding of participation. Applying the systemic design methodological approach, researchers address the complexity of citizens’ relationship with information, allowing users to become active and not only informed about environmental management activities in the territory, reducing socio-environmental conflicts. This paper discusses the contribution of systems-oriented design as a relevant methodology to address the process of problem framing, need-finding, ideation, prototyping, testing and iteration in complex projects, where the EO acts as an example. It is concluded that the contribution of SOD was present in (a) the modelling of the complexity of the problem, incorporating the vision of each actor of the system, (b) the internal articulation of the multidisciplinary team of researchers to reach a single interdisciplinary result—the EO platform, and (c) the synthesis of new knowledge that allows the creation of a transdisciplinary methodological strategy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».