Disentangling Eudaemonia-focused Design as a Means of Flourishing Curation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The connection between humans and their homes is one that has been documented for centuries. However, the extent to which our built environments impact human physical, mental, and social health was not fully understood by the general public until the COVID-19 pandemic made this topic one of necessity and, therefore, everyday discourse. One group that was impacted most extremely by the pandemic was the older adult community. The loneliness epidemic that had begun pre-COVID was exacerbated by widespread quarantine mandates—ones especially common in countries like Australia. This older demographic needed not only to occupy home environments that supported their needs and desires but also to be meaningfully engaged during these isolating times. This presentation shares findings based on PhD research conducted in Australia in 2021, at a time when older adults were experiencing isolation during still-prevalent periods of lockdown throughout the country. It explores how intentional and fun creative activities were conducted virtually with older adults at home to engage participants remotely for the purpose of disentangling complex subjects relating to Human Building Interaction (specifically, older adult occupants, homes, and smart home technologies) and the emotional aspects of past, present, and desired future homes. The research was based on the premise of designing for the positive psychology construct of Aristotle’s eudaemonia—an interpretation of flourishing health, synonymous with being one’s best self—by considering an idyllic thriving future in addition to the tenets of self-determination theory, namely autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The art of exploring tangible design activities while considering eudaemonia leisurely at home resulted in the older adults identifying eudaemonic home design principles as planned as well as experiencing unexpected motivation, making improvements in their spaces and lives. The research contributes to knowledge about architectural design elements that cultivate flourishing health and well-being at home but also informs design praxis—underscoring how intentional design done even virtually has the potential to uncomplicate abstract or delicate subject matter, improve research and design experiences and prompt the realisation of people’s best selves.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».