MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7135477332

Enhancing supply chain sustainability: the role of GPT-based AI in agency and boundary spanning

2025· article· en· W7135477332 sur OpenAlexaff
Niladri Palit

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Établissements canadiensQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSupply chainIncentiveAgency (philosophy)Information asymmetryService managementSupply chain managementPrincipal–agent problemSustainability
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research Backdrop Achieving sustainability-related targets has become a priority for most modern organisations. Boundary Spanning Theory highlights the importance of mechanisms that connect stakeholders across organisational and functional boundaries. These mechanisms enhance collaboration, information flow, and trust, all of which are essential for achieving sustainability goals in supply chains (Grawe et al., 2015). However, efforts often fail due to a lack of effective collective action across the supply chain. Existing literature suggests that factors such as information asymmetry, moral hazard, and misaligned incentives significantly contribute to these failures (Hung et al., 2025). In supply chains, Agency Theory identifies challenges arising from divergent interests and information gaps between principals (e.g., business owners, customers) and agents (e.g., suppliers, managers). These issues, such as information asymmetry and moral hazard, result in inefficiencies and conflicting objectives. Although various coordination mechanisms have been proposed to address these challenges, including contract design (Alom et al., 2024) and the use of technology (Huang et al., 2025), such problems persist in modern supply chains. This often leads to inefficiencies and other supply chain disruptions (Huang et al., 2025). AI-based tools like GPT, with their advanced natural language processing (NLP) capabilities, present innovative solutions to long-standing challenges in supply chains. GPT-based systems can analyse vast datasets, generate valuable insights, and enable seamless communication among stakeholders. These capabilities hold great potential for addressing agency problems and promoting boundary-spanning activities within supply chains. However, the existing supply chain literature offers limited exploration of such AI-based applications (Henderson, 2023). This research aims to address this gap by answering the following research question: "How can AI-based tools like GPT enhance the principles of Agency Theory to reduce information asymmetry and improve boundary spanning in complex supply chains?" Methodology This research utilises semi-structured interviews as a qualitative methodology to address the research question outlined in the introduction. Such techniques are well-suited for examining the intricate relationship between agency issues and boundary-spanning requirements, particularly when leveraging AI-based technologies to meet sustainability targets (Jamieson et al., 2023). The study aims to interview supply chain managers and information systems managers from a focal food sector buyer organisation in the UK, as well as managers from its supplier organisations who oversee the supply chain relationship with the buyer. Given that a significant portion of food in the UK is imported, rigorous quality checks are critical to ensure safety throughout the supply chain, safeguarding public health and well-being. This study will adopt a purposive sampling strategy, a non-probability method commonly used in qualitative research. This approach enables the selection of cases directly relevant to the research questions by facilitating interviews with key stakeholders. The research will adopt an abductive approach, which is particularly suitable for theory development (Dubois and Gadde, 2002). NVivo 14, a computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software, will be utilised for analysis. NVivo's capabilities support the open coding method, enabling the identification and emergence of relevant themes (Corbin and Strauss, 2014). Findings This research is expected to provide valuable insights into how contemporary disruptive technologies, such as GPT-based AI, can help supply chains address barriers like information asymmetry and misaligned incentives. By doing so, it aims to demonstrate how sustainability targets can be achieved not only at the individual organisational level but across entire supply chains. Relevance/Contribution A recent report published by the UK Parliament highlights the UK food sector's significant reliance on imports, noting that £58.1 billion worth of food and drink were imported in 2022 (Dillon and Wentworth, 2022). Many of these imports come from climate-vulnerable regions, further complicating sustainability efforts. While the report underscores the potential benefits of transitioning to more local food supply chains, such a shift is likely to be constrained by complex trade practices. This raises concerns about whether food sector organisations in the UK can achieve their sustainability targets. As a result, advancing theoretical frameworks that address boundary-spanning challenges across supply chains could provide valuable insights and contribute to the development of more efficient and sustainable practices.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,015
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,005
Communication savante0,0060,008
Science ouverte0,0020,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast)Même sujetSupply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementTravaux en français237 207