Predicting and explaining improvement in work and social adjustment in clients attending police service psychological therapies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Police officers face traumatic experiences such as violence, verbal abuse, exposure to accidents and crime scenes. This can lead to mental health conditions which extend into retirement as well as impacting the officers’ immediate family, resulting in the potential for impairment in work and social adjustment. Some police services therefore offer psychological mental health services to retired and retiring officers and their families. This study focuses on analysing data from the digital administrative system of a psychological therapies service offered to police officers and their families in Northern Ireland. The aim was to explore the mental health and demographic factors that predict changes in work and social adjustment through attending the service. Whilst past studies have focused on the factors related to mental health issues in police officers, fewer studies have focused on retired police officers and their families. Additionally, few studies have focused on impairment in work and social adjustment in retired and retiring police officers and their families. To address these knowledge gaps, machine learning approaches were applied alongside traditional statistical techniques to predict changes in the clients score on the work and social adjustment scale. Data were from the services administrative system, with a total of 636 observations included in the study, split into a training set (80%) and test set (20%). Ten fold cross validation, repeated five times, was used to tune the model parameters of common machine learning algorithms including decision trees, gradient boosted machines, and random forests. Interpretable machine learning techniques were applied to gain additional insight, including partial dependence plots and permutation variable importance. Descriptive statistics indicated that clients attending the service have an average age of 51 years, with 70% male, and 54% married. The most frequent condition categories include ‘combination’ (59%), ‘other’ (19%), and ‘psychological trauma’ (17%), with frequent subcategories including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (37%) and Anxiety Disorder (17%). Clients have an average presenting score on the work and social adjustment scale of 21 (scale range 0 – 40). Results show a statistically significant (p<0.05) improvement in work and social adjustment during attendance at the service, with an average reduction in impairment of 10 points. More complex machine learning algorithms were most accurate in modelling the determinants of work and social adjustment, with gradient boosting resulting in the most accurate predictions on the test dataset (RMSE 7.63, R-Squared 0.42). Important predictors of improvement include baseline characteristics, completion of the full episode of care, episode length, and the client’s motivation. These relationships are further explored using techniques from interpretable machine learning, including partial dependence plots, highlighting more complex non-linear relationships. The findings have important scientific and practical implications. The results reveal important determinants of improvement in work and social adjustment. The results also highlight the potential benefit from the application of machine learning approaches alongside traditional statistical techniques in analysing psychological therapy data. This can provide useful insights into service delivery and evaluation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».