The Transformation of European Airpower: Implications for the Royal Danish Air Force
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Denmark will buy new fighter aircraft in 2015. This is stated in the 20014-17 Defense Agreement. The Danish Parliament will accordingly need to allocate funds in the range of 20 to 30 billion Danish kroner to replace the Royal Danish Air Force’s fleet of aging F-16 fighter jets. This will be the largest defence procurement program in a generation and it will have long-term effects on Danish military capabilities as well as the procurement plans and opportunities of the Danish Armed Forces. Substantial effort is currently being put into deliberating and preparing a comprehensive platform for making the final decision. A dedicated “New Combat Aircraft Program Office” within the Ministry of Defence is conducting analyses of the strategic, military, economic, and industrial issues inherent in the choice between the three competitor aircraft. These will inform members of Parliament as they choose the number and type of replacement aircraft. This decision, in turn, will determine the general capabilities and shape of the Royal Danish Air Force (RDAF) for the next 40 years. Denmark is not alone in making such significant decisions at this time. The United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden have faced similar requirements and have recently made, or will soon make, similar decisions. These countries have modernized, reorganized, downsized, restructured, adapted, and transformed their airpower capabilities in ways that can inform Danish decisions and stimulate debate about the future of Danish airpower. The intent of this symposium is to provide analyses of these experiences by scholars and officers from these countries to Danish civilian and military policy makers and to the wider public. Our objective is not to consider or judge which aircraft is best or make recommendations as to appropriate investments. It is, rather, to provide a platform for discussing the long-term opportunities and constraints that such an investment entails. If Denmark’s experience with the F-16s is instructive, new aircraft will enable new capabilities and new opportunities for their use. These could require changes in the organization of the RDAF, the number and type of its personnel, their training, education, and career development, ethos, the support and maintenance structure, and basing. Furthermore, a valuable lesson from the F-16 program is that international collaboration in missions, modernization, maintenance, and training is essential in today’s use of airpower. Understanding what Denmark’s allies and partners have done and will do to overcome similar challenges and realize similar opportunities should prove useful as politicians, civil servants, and officers are required to make further decisions as new aircraft are being integrated into Danish and allied air force structures in the period ahead.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».