MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7138063303 · doi:10.25675/3.026303

Salt chemistry effects on salinity assessment and soil solution modeling in the Arkansas River basin, Colorado

2006· other· en· W7138063303 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Curtis Allen Cooper, Jessica G. Davis, Freeman M. Smith, Greg L. Butters, Grant Cardon, James A. Ippolito

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen MIND · 2006
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesWater Resources Research Institute, North Carolina State UniversityU.S. Geological SurveyU.S. Department of Agriculture
Mots-clésSoil waterSalinitySoil salinityGypsumIrrigationGroundwaterSoil testExtraction (chemistry)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Electrical conductivity is an essential indicator of soil quality. Methods used to measure electrical conductivity (EC) were examined to determine the effects of laboratory analysis and extrapolations to in-situ conditions. Methods were tested using combinations of (1) surrogate irrigation waters (SI) to saturate soils over a range of chemical concentrations, (2) soils with different salinity levels, and (3) soils ground or retaining aggregates. Baseline soil EC levels were measured from soil extracts that were saturated with distilled water (ECe) and showed no significant difference between ground and aggregated treatments for the low salinity soil ECe. When the low salinity soils were saturated with SI waters, the response ECs varied as SI concentrations increased. The sum of the baseline ECe and SI EC were not equal to the measured EC above approximately 3.5 dS m-1, suggesting that gypsum dissolution was becoming limited. Soils with high salinity (ECe >8 dS m-1) lacked structure and aggregates and could not be compared to ground soils. None of the tests with the high salinity ground soils had the sum of the baseline (distilled water) ECe and the SI EC equal to the measured EC of soils saturated with SI. Multiple extractions from the same soil sample were processed to determine salt removal potential from calcareous/gypsiferous soil. The Ca concentrations remained relatively constant over 14 extractions while Na concentrations decreased. The ECe decreased from above 8 dS m-1 in the initial extraction to approximately 4 dS m-1 by the 9th extraction, and remained stable to the 14th extraction. This stable ECe suggests that mineral reservoirs of gypsum and calcite remain in the soils. These mineral reservoirs have implications for salinity removal, which becomes limited to the more soluble salts and minerals (e.g. Na and mirabilite). Examination of the multiple extraction data suggests that improved leaching will not successfully lower the EC level below approximately 4 dS m-1 due to the gypsum and calcite reservoirs in the soil. Combinations of the irrigation water chemistry and precipitation and dissolution chemistry can potentially complicate or negate expected leaching potential. Mineralogical variations associated with salinity influence the calibration of the electromagnetic induction meter because the ions are the primary carriers of the electromagnetic resonance. Soils in the high plains of the lower Arkansas River Basin of Colorado are reservoirs of calcite and gypsum. When ions in solution precipitate, their influence on the electromagnetic resonance is decreased. Current EM-38 (Geonics, Ontario, Canada) calibration equations for the lower Arkansas River Basin rely upon electromagnetic measurements in the vertical position (EMv) and water content measurements to predict saturated paste electrical conductivities (ECe). Calibration equations developed in this research, use either depth averaged or depth weighted salt concentrations and/or predicted pore water salt concentrations from Visual Minteq. For example, the current Downstream sub-region calibration equation relating EM readings to soil ECe has an R2 is 0.54 with an root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.16 dS m-1. The equation from this research, using depth weighted Mg concentrations and SAR with Visual Minteq has an R2 of 0.93 with a RMSE of 1.34 dS m-1, and is effective for both the Upstream and Downstream sub-regions. Validation of these equations suggests that predictability is equivalent between the initial sub-region model and the models for the entire region. The inclusion of the chemistry/mineralogy in the calibration equations serves to resolve some of the unevenness of the EMv-ECe calibration, but at the cost of more complex computing and data requirements. However, the inclusion of the chemical data offers an alternate approach not yet utilized in extrapolating the calibration of the EM-38 from a field to a regional scale. Calcareous soils in the Lower Arkansas River Basin are impacted by salt concentrations in irrigation water and high ground water tables. Leaching many of these impacted soils is not effective in reducing salinity due to capillary rise at locations with high water tables. Modeling of management options for these soils can predict potential changes in the salt accumulation in the soil. Three locations with different levels of salinity chemistry and electrical conductivities were modeled in the Hydras-ID version 3.0 (HID) computer program, which has been coupled with UNSATCHEM. This HID program allows modeling of soil hydraulic properties, root growth, carbon dioxide production and transport, as well as primary ion reactions and flux both in solution and as solids. Surface water quality was varied in the model runs, along with the depth to ground water and cropping options. Soil surface evaporation led to evaporites forming on the soil surface for most model runs, particularly for the fallow runs. The ground water was predicted as a source of salts in the modeled soil profile. The uptake of water by the crop was found to be a driving factor in the location of the salt accumulation within the soil profile. Changes in irrigation water quality influenced the magnitude of the peak salt concentrations but not the depth of those peaks. The volume of water applied altered the depth to the peak salt concentrations; additionally, the ground water also contributed to the depth to the peak salt concentrations. Precipitates of gypsum and calcite were the primary repositories of precipitated salts in the soil profile and were subject to redistribution within the soil profile. It is concluded that no single management option will lead to the salinity decreases needed to improve crop production. Potentially costly management options are required to improve soil salinity problems.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,439
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,873

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,283 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen MIND→Travaux en français237 207→