Together. An OER Book by the GOGN Picture Book Team
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<b>About the book</b>This picture book is for young children and adults alike. It can be read and explored together. The story is about three friends who went on an adventure down the river to build a playground. On their way they meet other animals who seem to put obstacles in their way. Read the story to discover what happens next. The story was written and illustrated by a group of individuals from different parts of the world who worked together online over 6 months. They also had the help of many other educators from around the world who generously contributed their ideas and the characters of the story also originate from their contributions. All committed to creating a socially just world where education is available to all. <br>Values such as sharing, collaborating and helping others are central to this mission of what is called open education and will help towards achieving the UN’s Global SustainableDevelopment Goal 4, “Quality Education for All”https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4<br>Some may recognise other stories and fairytales in this story. The illustrations are a remix of details of exhibits from the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, available under CC0 and new illustrations. <br>This project was supported by a Global OER Graduate Network (GOGN) Fellowship in 2020.<br><b>Useful Links:</b>https://zenodo.org/record/4703978#.YYGBN57P02w<br><b>The picture book team</b>Chrissi Nerantzi @chrissinerantzi, Principal Lecturer in Academic CPD, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK; open practitioner and researcher, picture book writer and crafter. She co-authored this story with Helene, Penny, Paola, Verena and Gino. She also co-illustrated the book with Ody. <br>Hélène Pulker @HelenePulker, Senior Lecturer in French, The Open University, UK, open practitioner, teacher trainer, language materials developer, researcher in open and distance education, Co-author of the picture book story.<br>Penny Bentley @penpln doctoral student at the University ofSouthern Queensland. She co-authored this story with the team. <br>Paola Corti @paola5373, Project Manager at METID, Politecnico di Milano (Italy) and OE Community Manager at SPARC Europe. She co-authored this story with the team.<br>Verena Roberts @verenanz, Adjunct Assistant Professor with the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary & Instructional Designer with Thompson Rivers University. She co-authored this book with the team.<br>Gino Fransman @ginofransman Academic Developer and#OpenEdInfluencers' Project Leader at Nelson Mandela University (South Africa), OE4BW project author/ mentor and advisory board member & Open Advocacy champion. He co-authored this story with the team.<br>Ody Frank @ody_frank, Sixth-Form animation and game design student. Ody co-illustrated and designed the book.<br>Bryan Mathers @bryanmmathers Founder, Visual Thinkery. Bryan provided mentorship to the illustrators.<br>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,255 | 0,016 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle