Volunteer Experience at Active Kids
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The purpose of the following study was to explore the volunteer experience at Active Kids for Undergraduate Kinesiology students at UBC. Particularly, our study is interested in learning the volunteer's motives in joining Active Kids and how their motivation changed throughout their involvement. This will provide valuable information on potential implementation to improve volunteer experiences. From our surveys, 89.5% of the respondents would recommend the Active Kids experience to other Kinesiology students. In addition, when asked to analyze the motives for joining Active Kids, many valued the importance of hands-on experience and the practical learning environment that Active Kids offers. However, when prompted to detail changes that they wish the program to implement, many propose wishes to include training with children with different disabilities and more workshops to consolidate the specific coaching skills. Proposed Recommendations Our recommendations for potential changes and modifications to the Active Kids program to better enhance UBC’s Kinesiology student volunteer experiences are as follows: 1. Provide specific training sessions based on specific sports programs 2. Include training to work with children with various disabilities (physical and/ or intellectual) 3. Provide continual planning and training throughout the program 4. Increase guidance on certification options and potential career pathways 5. Enhance volunteer engagement through leadership roles Please note that while we recognize the significance of these recommendations in enhancing volunteer experiences and understanding the logistics of program facilitation, we acknowledge that some changes may not be feasible to implement immediately due to logistical constraints. Value With these proposed recommendations, we expect that more Kinesiology students will recognize the values that Active Kids brings in terms of both practical and university experience. These proposed changes have the potential to enhance the volunteer experience, leading to the potential for an enhanced coaching staff pool and expanding new volunteers. Final Thoughts and Next Steps Enhancing volunteer experience brings forth the enrichment of the academic and university experience of Kinesiology student volunteers. From the potential of these proposed changes, we expect an increased volunteer satisfaction rate and enhanced motivation to continue their involvement at Active Kids. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».