Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aim. To reveal the attitudes of medical doctors and their awareness on clinical research ethics in India and Lithuania. Methods: A cross sectional survey was conducted simultaneously major hospitals in India and Lithuania. Overall, 180 medical doctors (97 from India, 83 from Lithuania) were interviewed anonymously (N=180) by using the convenience sampling method. The response rate was 60 %. The originally elaborated questionnaire was employed. The descriptive and factor staitistical analysis elaborated, the coreelation between variables evaluated by (the correlation between variables measured by χ2, significance evaluated when p<0.05. Results. It was revealed that almost all of Indian and only a quarter of Lithuanian respondents were critical about the approach that ethics are equally important as scientific research. It was revealed that Indian respondents tend more to disagree that philosophers should not dictate what is ethical and what is not while almost half of the Lithuanians agreed. The significant differences comparing respondents by the country were also determined by comparing their ethical awareness of research: 83.5% Indians and 64% of Lithuanians were aware that research participants do not have to participate in all procedures of clinical trials after they have given consent. More Indians than Lithuanians disagreed to the statement that participation of disadvantaged people in clinical trials is a good opportunity to get new treatment options. While comparing the level of awareness of Lithuanian and Indians in clinical rearch ethics, we found that the mean average awareness score of Indian respondents was 36.53 (SD= 1.52) out of maximum of 45 and it was higher as compared to Lithuanian respondents’ mean average awareness score of 31.86 (SD=3.46). The level of awareness increase with increase in clinical experience of respondents and there was improvement in thinking that science is equally important as ethics. The age was important factor for the enhancement of level of awareness (0.44) and less critical attitudes that science is more important than ethics - 0.50 meaning that the increasing level of awareness depends on the level of increased age and experience. Conclusions. The attitudes of medical doctors towards ethical research in clinical trials were found to be mostly depended on the country. Lithuanian doctors are more inclined to focus on the scientific research and progress of clinical trials, Indian doctors tend to take more account of ethical research ethics. The comparison of perceptions and awareness of medical doctors about research ethics in Lithuania and India revealed that Indian medical doctors are more likely to comply to ethical requirements in clinical research compared to Lithuanian medical doctors.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».