Social melancholy and decolonisation of psychic space in selected diasporic Chinese women’s novels in English
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Diasporic women from ethnic minorities have often been disproportionally stereotyped, stigmatised, and labelled as depressed or psychopathological due to their constant abjection and oppression by white-supremacist and patriarchal ideologies. Such negative stereotypes of women from minorities are recurrent themes in diasporic Chinese women’s novels, thus substantiating prevailing discourses about the essentialist deficiency and passivity inherent in women. However, this study investigates how female psychopathy is not so much the representation of individual pathology as a social one. By examining the psycho-affective status of female characters in selected works by diasporic Chinese women writers in white-dominated countries like Canada, Australia and America, namely SKY Lee’s Disappearing Moon Café (1990), Hsu-Ming Teo’s Love and Vertigo (2000), and Celeste Ng’s Everything I Never Told You (2014), this study aims to demonstrate how institutional power hierarchies and oppression produce female psychopathy incarnated in melancholy, depression, and suicide, etc. This study moves away from the intrapsychic paradigm of Freudian psychoanalysis and adopts a psychoanalytic social approach. This study utilises Kelly Oliver’s Theory of Social Melancholy (2004) to examine the mechanism of multi-layered social oppression in disturbing women’s psychic space and rendering them passive and depressed. Oliver postulates social melancholy as the melancholy of oppression resulting from the loss of self as a loved or lovable agent due to colonisation of psychic space by dominant oppressive ideologies. The central argument of this study is that symptoms of psycho-affective disorders prevalent among selected female characters should not be interpreted as manifestations of individual pathology. Rather, they are consequences of social melancholy due to colonisation of psychic space by institutional ideologies like racism and sexism. The study finds that sexually or racially marginalised women characters suffer from social melancholy because of the unavailability of positive representation of womanhood or motherhood in the phallocentric and white-supremacist social contexts, thereby undermining their subjectivity as active agents and rendering them passive. Therefore, pathologising women as deficient or depressed covers up the institutional causes of the prevalent psychopathy among women. Moreover, as colonisation of psychic space operates by suppressing individual agency and precluding sublimation, this study also explores the possibility of decolonisation. Drawing from Oliver’s Theory of Witnessing Subjectivity (2001), the study testifies that the process of witnessing works as testimony to the unspeakable lived experience of the racialised and gendered female subjects. The witnessing narratives constitutive of address-ability and response-ability open up the therapeutic possibility to articulate, thereby decolonising female characters’ psychic space and reconstructing their subjectivity. This study expands the critical analysis of diasporic women’s works by presenting an alternative approach to understanding women’s psychopathy and subjectivity (de)formation, thus depathologising women characters’ psychopathy. The significance of this study is that it not only challenges the sociocultural stereotypes that stigmatise women’s images, but also explores an ethic of responsibility. It transcends the pathology of recognition between superior subjects and inferior objects that justifies domination and oppression.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».