Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Paulista, and on the literature of the subject.The nomenclature is essentially that of the British Museum 'Catalogue of Birds'.The synonymy of the species is given, with a brief mention of their distinctive characteristics and distribution, and the character of tbeir occurrence in Mao Paulo.The number of species recorded as occurring in the State is 59 ø , of which just one half are Passeres.--J. A. A. Dearborn's Birds of Belknap and Merrimac Counties, New Hampshired --This neatly published list of •75 species is based on the personal experience of the writer during the past ten years, supplemented by other information from reliable observers, duly accredited.Although the list is incomplete, it is evidently trustworthy so far as it goes, and is judiciouslyannotated.The Loon (Gavœa œmber),Mr.Dearborn states, "has plaiuly decreased within the last t;vo decades.Twenty years ago they ß bred every summer at one or more of the ponds which are the headwaters of the Suncook River."They have, however, been so far killed or frightened away by "wanton hunters" that none have nested there of late, though they still breed at Lake Winnepisaukee.The Blue Bird was very scarce in •895 , following their destruction at the south by the severe weather of the previous winter.They were more common in x896, andin 1897 had nearly reached their normal nmnbers."This sudden increase," says Mr. Dearborn, '•is rather puzzling, when one considers that ordinarily there is no perceptible increase from year to year." --J. A. A. Nash's 'The Birds of Ontario in Relation to Agriculture'?--The principal groups are briefly reviewed in reference to their influence tipon agriculture.The seven pages devoted to the Birds of Prey are based mainly on Dr. Fisher's well known investigations, conducted under the direction of Dr. Merriam for the U. S-I)epartment of Agriculture.The Crows, Jays and Blackbirds are considered at stone length, with a verdict that they have little to recommend them from the econolnic standpoint, their good deeds being in general quite balanced by their evil ones, while the Blue Jay is rather strongly condeInned, mainly on accotint of its fondness for the eggs and young of birds much more useful than itself.The Cow Bird is regarded as a pest, on account of the "terrible destruction '• of the small, insectivorous birds it chooses for its foster parents, each Cow •A [ Preliminary List ] of the [ Birds ] of [ Belknap and Merrimack Counties [ New Hampshire [ with Notes ] By [ Ned Dearborn.] Presented to the Faculty of the New Hampshire College I of Agriculture and the Mechanic Arts as a Thesis [ for the Degree of Master of Science, ] Juue, •898 [ --I Durham [ New Hampshire College [ •898.--8vo, pp.34.• The Birds of Ontario in Relation to Agriculture.By Charles W. Nash.Toronto.8vo, pp.32, with 33 half-tone plates, froin drawings by the Author.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,072 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».