Notice bibliographique
Résumé
194• J 6erirat Vots 143 at seeing itH On being told that they were seeing the southernmost Starling, they looked at it with more than ordinary interest!This statement was made on the spur of the moment, but all subsequent efforts to trace any previous occurrence have proved unsuccessful.The writer has communicated with such authorities as Messrs. R. J. Longstreet, Daytona Beach; Louis Stimson, Miami; and Donald J. Nicholson, Orlando.None of them have any record of the Starling south of the limits outlined above.Mr. Longstreet edits the Florida Naturalist and would be, perhaps, in the best position to know of any southern records.So it appears that the last area in the East and South has now been penetrated by this species.Whether the extreme cold of early February was a factor remains to be seen, but on all subsequent trips (there have now been nine of them) no sign of the bird has been noted.Presumably it is the forerunner of others to come.--An•xa•D•RSPR•T, JR., Okeechobee, Florida.Scissor-tailed Flycatcher in Flortda.--OnOctober 27, 1946, I saw two Scissortailed Flycatchers sitting on a wire near the heart of Clewiston, Florida.They remained resting while I had ample time to remove my binoculars from the case and observe the birds at close range.I have lived in this area since early in 1941 but this is the first time I have seen this species in Florida.--WmnAm•E. Dmn•v, Clewiston, Florida.Sooty Shearwater in western North Clarolina.--Whilevacationing in the Blue Ridge Mountains, the writer stopped at the store of Mrs. W. C. Irwin of Sparta, Alleghany County, and was attracted to a mounted specimen of Pu•nus griseus.This shearwater was blown into the town of Twin Oaks in August, 1939, after a storm on the coast.It is about 300 miles from here to the Atlantic coast.--W.H. B•n, 4311 W. Knox Rd., Co•ege Park, Maryland.The American E•Iret in New Brunswick.--Thereare records of at least nine of these birds (Casmerodius albus egretta) which have wandered north to New Brunswick during the last seventy-five years.These have appeared not only in late summer, as the numerous published reports that they wander north after the breeding season would lead us to expect, but have been recorded from early April until November.James W. Banks, in manuscript notes discovered at the New Brunswick Museum, stated that a pair were seen many times during the summer of 1870 in the vicinity of Gagetown, Queens County, New Brunswick.Ruthyen Deane in the Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club (1879), quoted C. J. Maynard, who told him about examining an immature specimen shot at White Head Island, Grand Manan, Novembcr 3, 1878.Dr. Philip Cox, for many years Professor of Natural History at the University of New Brunswick, described one of these birds to the writer which he had seen many years ago at Maugerville, Sunbury County.This is our most northerly record.Ora W. Knight (1897) stated that G. A. Boardman had one in his collection which was taken at Grand Manan but no date is given.There is a specimen without data in the Boardman Collection at the New Brunswick Museum to-day which may be the one referred to by Knight.Olin Sewall Pettingill, Jr. (1939) gave two new records for the American Egret in the Grand Manan Archipelago.One was found dead on Hay Island, April 5, 1936, and another was collected at North Head, Grand Manan, April 12, 1930.The latter is now in Allan Moses's collection.The most recent record for Grand Manan is one which, according to a press report, was seen at Ingall's Head in June, 1945, by Mrs. C. W. Green.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».