Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Geographic variation in the White-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia !eucophrys.--Richard C. Banks.1964.Univ. of California Publs.Zoi51., 70: 1-123, 28 figs., 43 tables.$2.50.--Thisstudy is based on an examination of 2,103 breedingseason specimens representing 62 populations and groups of populations in various parts of the range.Mensural characters examined include length of wing, tail, bill, and tarsus; also tarsus/wing ratio and, when available, weight.These are thoroughly analyzed and samples of more than nine individuals are given elahorate statistical treatment.The results are interpreted in detail, and, in the course of this, effective use is made of numerous tables and figures.Both interpopulational and intrapopulational variations are investigated.The examination of color characters is less thorough.Emphasis is on variation in rump coloration, segregated into seven categories.Color of the lores and the bend of the wing receive careful attention also.Variations in the colors of the striped upper back, fully as important as those of the rump, receive much less detailed treatment.Variation in colors of the under parts, which is of greater taxonomic significance than seems to be generally realized, was not investigated at all!The reviewer believes that examination of a wider range of color characters would probably have lent weight to some of the author's conclusions and might well have modified others.The author finds the two Pacific coast subspecies Z. I. pugetensis and Z. I. nuttalli valid, but weakly separable from each other by size, chiefly the longer tarsus of nuttalli.Color differences between the two are considered unreliable due to differential feather wear, which the author attributes to a less extensive prenuptial molt in nuttalli.A comparison of freshly-molted specimens of the two races might have shed additional light on this question, but unfortunately this does not seem to have been done.These two similar races differ from the other subspecies in possessing shorter wings, darker upper parts, and yellow (instead of white) coloration at the bend of the wing.In the vast remainder of the range the author recognizes only two subspecies: Z. I. gambelii (Alaska and most of western Canada) and the nominate race (eastern Canada east of James and Hudson hays, the western mountains of the United States, and the Cypress Hills of Canada).There is a broad area of intergradation in the Hudson and James bays region, and also in northwestern Montana and contiguous mountainous parts of Canada.The most reliable distinguishing mark separating these races is still the traditional one, the presence of a black interruption in the white superciliary stripe at the anterior corner of the eye (nominate race) versus the lack of such a black interruption (gambelii).Various degrees of intermediacy occur.Surprisingly, Banks concludes that the black-lored birds of the mountains of western United States and the Cypress Hills of Canada (Z. l. oriantha) are not satisfactorily separable from the b!ack-lored birds of eastern Canada, and he therefore relegates oriantha to the synonymy of the nominate race.It seems regrettable that he apparently did not investigate the useful color characters of the under parts or examine in more detail those of the upper back.Re-examination of material in the National Museum of Canada leaves no doubt in this reviewer's mind that, contrary to Banks, oriantha is a valid subspecies, separable from eastern black-lored birds by its paler upper back and lighter under parts (breast markedly paler gray; flanks and under tail coverts duller buff).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,788 | 0,755 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».