Notice bibliographique
Résumé
When Audubon received the first specimens of this bird he considered it identical with the Mourning Warbler of the East, notwithstanding that Townsend regarded it as distinct, and not having published a plate of the latter species he drew'one from these western specimens and issued it with the title Sylviafihiladelfihia. Upon Townsend's return he demonstrated to Audubon that the two birds were distinct and a drawing of the eastern species was thereupon published, also (this time correctly) eutitled •S•ylvfa fihiladel2•hltt.The fifth volume of Audubou's 'Ornithological Biography,' which appeared soon after, contained the accounts of the two species, the western one being described as new under' the name of Sylvia macgillivrayi.Townsend meantime prepared his 'Journal' for publication and in the appendix included a list of the birds found by him in the West, and descriptions of such as had not already beeu described by Audubon.Among the latter was this Warbler which he called Sylvia 7•lmleL after W. F. Tolmie an officer of the Hudson Bay Company whose acquaintance he had made at Fort Vancouver.Townsend supposed that Audubon would use this name, as he had indicated it on the specimens that he had sent him, and he was much annoyed to find that he had substituted Sylvia macg'illlvrayl for it, claiming at the same time that his own name tolmiei had priority t.This claim has not been recognized in late years, but investigation shows tha• Townsend's 'Journal' xvas issued and received at the Philadelphia Academy by April x6, 1839, while Audnbon's fifth volrune was not received at the London Athenaeum until June 22 of the same year, and did not of course reach America until later still.These facts show that Townsend's name has clear priority, and in the interests of accuracy and justice it is a satisfaction to make the correction.Macgilliw'ay's Warbler' should therefore stand in our list as Geolhly25i• tolmiei; whether or not the common name shall also be changed to Tolmie's Warbler we shall leave to the judgment of the A. 0. U. Committee.--WIT•m• STON•, Acad.Ahzt.Scœene•% PhiladelJ•hia.Sprague's Pipit near New Orleans, La.--On Nov. 24, •898 , I fonnd in the drier parts of a favorite Snipe field, across the Mississippi from New Orleans, five Sprague's Pipits (Anl/tus sfira•wtet'i): I had found them, as had also Messrs. Pring, Kopman, and W. B. Allison, in the vicinity of the city before, but these were the first I had seen for some years, and were earlier than any noted in former years.I flushed the birds repeatedly, shot one, a female, and had excellent opportunities for watching their • Jour. A. N.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,189 | 0,038 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».