Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Torrey's 'The Foot-Path Way? --Mr.Torrey's writings always have a charm in their happily worded sentences that never duI1 the delicate edge of his humor, and ttmt bring us the fragrance of the northern woods without loss of any of its freshness, but each time he gathers together a new volume we realize more and more the weightier reasons fox' his preaminence in the group of writers with whom one naturally associates him.He is not merely a phiIosopher and a sayer of happy things.He observes nature keenly as well as sympathetically, and'with a spirit of scientific caution that stamps his work with a value which the writings of many a more prominent ornithologist will never possess.About two thirds of the chapters in the present collection are devoted to birds, and in them he tells much that is interesting besides some facts of real importance--as fro' instance the record of the Pine Grosbeak as a summer bird on Mt.Lafayette, New Hampshire.Two chapters are given to his experience of the breeding habits of Trockt'lus colubris; there is another upon 'Robin Roosts'; and such titles as 'June in Franconia,' 'The Passing of the Birds,' 'A Great Blue Heron,' and 'December Out-ofdoors,' give a fair idea of the other ornithological contents of the volume.Most of the chapters have already appeared in the pages of the 'Atlantic Monthly,' but their reappearance in the present form deserves a cordial welcome.-C.F. B. Ornithological Report of the Canadian Institute?--Thispublication is a record of the members' observations reported at the meetings from April xS, x89o, to June 9, x89x' It contains among other things a detailed report, of fourteen pages, from a number of observers, on the occurrence of the Evening Grosbeak in Ontario during the winter of x889•9o, and an annotated list, by W. L. Kells, of nearly a hundred and fifty species occuring at Listowel, Ontario.In addition to these there are a multitude of brief notes, some of the highest interest, others less important, relating many of them to habits, but the majority to dates of migration, etc., of various species, rare and common.With hardly an exception the localities referred to are all within the Province of Ontario.It is impossible here to quote any, even the most interesting, of the records, in spite of the importance of many 6f them, especially of such as bear upon the faunal peculiarities of the region.The number of persons who have contributed to the report is large, and their work seenas, on the whole, to show unusual accuracy as well as t The Foot-Path Way I by I Bradford Torrey I [five lines=quotation] I [vignette] l Boston and New York I Houghton• Mifflin and Company I The Riverside Press, Cambridge [ I892-I6ø• pp.[iv,] 245.'• Proceedings ] of the [ Ornithological Sub-section I of the Biological Section of the [ Canadian Institute I for I x89ø-9 x ] edited by the editing committee.I (Extracted from the Proceedings of the Canadian Institute by permission I of the Council.)I --I Price--25 cents.[ --I Toronto: ] The Copp• Clark Company• Limited, [ 9 Front Street West.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,090 | 0,019 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».