Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program Volume 210 Scientific Results: Drilling The Newfoundland Half of the Newfoundland–Iberia Transect: The First Conjugate Margin Drilling in a Nonvolcanic Rift, Sites 1276 and 1277
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This Scientific Results volume covers Leg 210 of the cruises of the Drilling Vessel JOIDES Resolution, St. Georges, Bermuda, to St. John’s, Newfoundland, Sites 1276 and 1277, 6 July–6 September 2003. Ocean Drilling Program Leg 210 was devoted to studying the history of rifting and postrift sedimentation in the Newfoundland–Iberia rift. The primary objective was to sample the deep sedimentary structure and basement in order to investigate early rift development. A related objective was to study the shallower stratigraphy and to elucidate the postrift sedimentation processes and paleoceanographic history of this gateway between the North Atlantic and the sub-Arctic seas. Drilling was conducted in the Newfoundland Basin along a transect conjugate to previous drilling on the Iberia margin (Legs 149 and 173). This was the first time that deep-sea drilling has been conducted on both sides of a nonvolcanic rift in order to understand the structural and sedimentary evolution of the complete rift system. The prime site during Leg 210 (Site 1276) was drilled in transitional crust between known continental crust and oceanic crust identified by magnetic Anomalies M3 to M0 (Barremian–Aptian). On the conjugate Iberia margin, extensive geophysical work and deep-sea drilling have shown that the transitional crust is exhumed mantle that is extensively serpentinized in its upper part. Transitional crust on the Newfoundland side, however, is typically a kilometer or more shallower and has much smoother topography, and seismic refraction data suggest that the crust may be thin (~4 km) oceanic crust. These features indicate that the rift may have developed asymmetrically. A major goal at Site 1276 was to investigate these differences by sampling basement and the facies responsible for a strong overlying basinwide reflection (U) that is poorly developed on the conjugate Iberia margin, together with the intervening lithologic section. Drilling on both sides of the Newfoundland-Iberia rift has produced surprising insights into nonvolcanic rifting but at the same time has raised important new questions. Perhaps the single most important observation has been that extensive tracts of mantle ("transition zones") were exhumed seaward of the edges of thinned continental crust and landward of oceanic crust formed by seafloor spreading (we use the term seafloor spreading here to mean generation of new seafloor at a discrete plate boundary and with a major, if not dominant, component of magmatic accretion). Drilling at Site 1277 seaward of anomaly M1 on the Newfoundland margin, and at Sites 897, 899, and 1070 in the area of anomalies M5 to M1 on the Iberia margin, demonstrated that basement there is serpentinized mantle with only very minor indications of magmatism, despite the fact that apparently normal magnetic anomalies are developed in this young part of the M-series reversals. Thus there are major questions not only about the source of the magnetic anomalies but also about whether the prolonged mantle exhumation should be considered to be "seafloor spreading" or just continued rifting, for example, of subcontinental mantle lithosphere. In addition, there are important questions about how expected tectonic events such as separation of continental crust or initiation of seafloor spreading might be manifested in the structural and stratigraphic record along the margins. Finally, drilling at Site 1276 provided the surprising result that substantial and possibly widespread diabase sills were intruded into postrift sediments of the Newfoundland Basin, whereas there is no evidence of similar magmatism on the Iberia margin. Was this magmatic pattern "inherited" because of asymmetries in mantle fertility that developed during rifting, or was it caused by another process, such as plate migration across a mantle plume?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,032 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».