MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7154849107 · doi:10.59236/emro.v27i10a134

Okpik

2025· article· W7154849107 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelsey Robertson

Notice bibliographique

RevueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousHomelandProperty (philosophy)Work (physics)The arcticArctic

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Distributed by Collective Eye Films, 1315 SE 20th Ave. #3, Portland OR 97214; 971-236-2056Produced by Caroline Cox, Tiffany Ayalik, and Kylik Kisoun TaylorDirected by Tiffany Ayalik and Kylik Kisoun Taylor2023, Streaming, 44 mins In an isolated location, north of the Arctic Circle in Canada’s Beaufort Delta Region, one man is attempting to follow in his Inuvialuit ancestors' footsteps. Kylik Kisoun Taylor returned to his cultural homeland at 16 and after reconnecting with his culture, he is now determined to see it thrive once again. In an environment seen far too often, indigenous individuals are facing a prolonged cultural shift. Land taken away, cheap and insufficient housing erected, and the idea of adapting or getting left behind. Kylik witnesses his community suffer in this way and has decided to get back to living off the land. He and his family moved to a bush camp; Teepee shelter, five dollars a day and no paying for utilities or property taxes: they make their own heat, catch their own food, and retrieve their own water. This was his solution, not only for housing crises and food insecurity, but a way to get back to his roots. To do this for his people, he is creating a self-sufficient, eco-friendly village. This community is built with the labor of indigenous and non-indigenous alike. As Kylik notes, it's not about indigenous and nonindigenous, it is about a need. His lofty goals and intentions of this village are to build a community for a continuous transfer of knowledge. The elders see their way of life slipping away, and this effort is to help ensure that knowledge is retained for the next generations. According to Kylik, the best way to learn about one’s culture is not in a classroom or through books, but by living it- experiencing it. This is why he has his own children involved in the making of the village. Instilling a work ethic and a different kind of education. Immersing themselves in the ways of their ancestors, learning to be self-sufficient, creating self-confidence, and learning the native language, in hopes of teaching others the same. Throughout the film, we are with Kylik and his people as they catch their food, forage the natural resources for building supplies, build a sod house, etc. A poignant quote from Kylik makes a statement, “We can’t ask the system that oppresses us, to heal us. We need to take action.” To Kylik and his community, this is their way of acting, showing what can be done, and what has always been done. There are no special lighting or formal interviews in this film- that is not what is needed. It is a raw experience, and a home footage-type videography was necessary for allowing the audience to see glimpses of the hard work and heart of this endeavor. There are some aerial shots of the location, and a traditional story told in fragments in the native language throughout the film. The native language is used occasionally; the majority is in English with English closed captions when the native language is spoken. It would have been helpful for the film to have spanned a longer period to see what kind of progress was made in the village, as well as get to know Kylik's background for better context, as this film only gives a glimpse of the beginnings. Despite this minor critique, I would recommend this film for viewing on various educational topics such as indigenous studies, sustainable living, or anthropology.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,922
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,000

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,9220,821

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,104
Tête enseignante GPT0,477
Écart entre enseignants0,373 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEducational Media Reviews OnlineMême sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207