Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This chapter describes and explains emotions in terms of their relationship with goals using a control theory approach. A comprehensive and widely cited overview of goals in psychology defined a goal as ‘internal representations of desired states, where states are broadly construed as outcomes, events or processes’ (Austin & Vancouver, 1996). Austin and Vancouver (1996) go on to give examples of these desired states, which include biological set points (e.g. body temperature) and abstractions of complex outcomes (e.g. career success, which could include achieving goals in sport), encompass wide-ranging durations from the present moment to the lifespan, and span the domains of the neurological, psychological, and social. Please note that goals in the psychological literature are much wider than the way that the term ‘goal’ is used in common parlance. A goal can include abstract, socially relevant set points such as being honest, worthwhile, or creative, as well as simple, concrete set points such as gripping a racquet tightly or keeping balance while in motion. Importantly, these authors found it necessary to use an organizing theoretical framework with specific operational definitions of its components for their review, and they used a form of control theory developed by Powers, often known as perceptual control theory (Powers, 1973, 2005). This chapter will begin with a rationale for why emotions can be understood in relation to goals. The wider literature on goals and emotions will be reviewed in order to describe the current state of knowledge in this area, and then the control theory model will be used to elaborate and describe a mechanistic, functional account of the role of emotions. This account will be divided into the components of control theory, explaining their relevance to emotion, and it will conclude with the implications of a goal-oriented approach to emotion informed by control theory. The chapter begins with an open-minded approach to the role of emotion within what is often regarded as a relatively mechanistic and ‘cold’ account – ‘goals’ and ‘control theory’. Yet the chapter converges on a conclusion that emotion exists in almost every feature of goal functioning, both unconscious and conscious, interpersonal and intrapersonal, and that emotions are a fundamental marker of the dynamic features of goals, such as conflict, higher-level perspective-taking, and change.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle