Practice 16 Justice-Doing: Institutional–Organizational Change
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Justice-doing goes beyond recognizing inequities and advocating for change. It involves taking direct, intentional, concrete actions to dismantle oppressive systems and co-create more equitable ones. Sandra, Melissa, and Jane examine how counsellors and psychotherapists can engage in justice-doing as part of their professional practice, turning their commitment to social justice into meaningful, transformative action within the organizations, communities, and institutions in which they are situated. They position therapy and activism as intertwined. Rather than helping those who are suffering to accommodate oppressive lives, justice-doing involves using any access to collective power to work toward transforming the social contexts that create and sustain oppression. The authors describe common elements in justice-doing. They then focus on specific examples of how healthcare practitioners might take action to enact institutional–organizational change: (a) advocacy, including interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration; (b) community work, including community engagement, community outreach, community capacity-enhancement, and consultation; (c) organizational development; (d) organizational policy change; and (e) program development and evaluation. Jane threads her expertise in community, organizational, and policy change throughout the chapter. Sandra, Melissa, and Jane emphasize the importance of cultural humility, inviting practitioners to step back, listen deeply, and recognize when to follow the leadership of others who are actively within their own cultural communities. An invitation to action encourages practitioners to demonstrate solidarity in healthcare and other settings through initiatives centring justice, accessibility, inclusion, diversity, and equity (JAIDE). Sandra, Melissa, and Jane are honoured to feature practice illustrations by the following co-authors: • Kitana Connelly offers an ink on canvas depiction of the flow of land energy with Eagle positioned as protector. • Lisa Gunderson challenges readers to move beyond allyship in justice-doing to embrace the roles of disruptor, dismantler, and abolitionist. • Kirby Huminuik describes a new Indigenous Mental Health and Well-Being Initiative through campus counselling services which models how effective policy can support responsive program development. • Jo Anni Joncas and Annie Pilote illustrate how institutional level changes in the conceptualization and implementation of guidance and career counselling can open up new education and career paths. • Gina Ko describes her use of participatory action research to foster ownership and agency of Muslim youth as they navigate competing demands on their loyalties. • Kaltrina Kusari examines the ideological and theoretical lens of postcolonialism, noting that globalization can both reinforce and challenge the legacies of colonialism, creating a complex and dynamic interplay between the two forces. • Stephanie Martin and Fatima Saleem share the story of Sarah to highlight the role of community outreach in work with Muslim women. • Sonya Sehgal provides an illustration of organizational change aimed at enhancing racial equity, drawing on strategies and practices that support the creation of an anti-racist workplace.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,140 | 0,012 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».