Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Distributed by Collective Eye Films, 1315 SE 20th Ave. #3, Portland OR 97214; 971-236-2056Produced by David Gross, Jo-Anne McGowan, Sarah Noonan, and Jennifer PeedomDirected by Gisela Kaufmann and Joseph Nizeti2023, Streaming, 40 mins Fungi: Web of Life is a fascinating and visually stunning documentary about fungi. The documentary provides a broad look at how fungi are connected to other organisms and the important ecological role fungi play in the environment. Fungi: Web of Life uses a voice-over narration by Björk and also features biologist Merlin Sheldrake on screen and via voice-over. Sheldrake is a popular science writer and fungi researcher who guides viewers through much of the film, introducing viewers to the Fungarium in Kew Gardens, the largest collection of fungi samples, and guides viewers through the Tarkine rainforest in Tasmania. The other primary focuses of the film are a group of fungal researchers in Yunnan, China led by Peter Mortimer, and a company, Ecovative Designs, that develops materials made out of mycelium. Each viewpoint is used to illustrate the central theme of the importance of fungi in the ecosystem and the potential of fungi to address issues facing humanity. The film also emphasizes how much scientists are still learning about fungi and its possible utilities. The highlight of Fungi: Web of Life is the stunning cinematography. It is filled with fascinating time-lapses of fungi growth and gorgeous landscapes. The time lapse photography is a particularly compelling way to look at fungi and it shows a view of fungi that will be new to many viewers. As a short documentary, there is not enough time to delve more deeply into these fascinating topics. As a result, the film provides mostly surface level overview, and it might not have the depth of information needed in a university setting; it would be most appropriate for a high school setting. Additionally, the film focuses on the importance of fungi on a larger scale and does not cover fungi at the organism or classification level. Viewers looking for academic information about fungi biology, classification or life cycles would be better served looking for more academic films. However, it would be a good introduction to fungi and some segments may be useful in specific university courses. Discussion of the role of fungi in the environment could be useful in ecology classes and explorations of fungi to make materials would be useful in applied science courses or engineering. Overall, Fungi: Web of Life is a well-crafted and compelling film that would be enjoyed by any audience. Awards:Best Cinamatography and Best Voice Over Cast (GeekFest Toronto); Best Eco Documentary (San Pedro International Festival); Best Educational Media (Raw Science Film Festival); Scientific Merit (SCINEMA International Film festival)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».