Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Bonnie Thompson, Tasha Hubbard, Jason Ryle, and George HupkaDirected by Tasha Hubbard2023, Streaming, 99 mins Early in Singing Back the Buffalo, viewers are introduced to “Buffalo Consciousness,” an idea central to the film that’s used to describe the bond between buffalo and indigenous people. The term recognizes spiritual and ecological elements that today serve as a uniting force for tribes throughout North America working together to restore buffalo populations. The film’s director, Tasha Hubbard, who based her doctoral dissertation on Buffalo Consciousness, follows native activists making profound impacts on their communities and the lands to which buffalo have returned. Their work reveals deep, systemic divides in the ways that native and non-native people have practiced conservation and restoration. The Buffalo Treaty, an intertribal alliance representing almost 50 nations, guides indigenous-led projects to restore buffalo to 6.3 million acres of land in Canada and the United States. Through the work of the treaty, buffalo populations have been reintroduced to areas including Banff National Park in Alberta and the Blackfeet Reservation in Montana. Left free in these places, their populations continue to grow and provide ecological benefits for other species. Throughout the film, native activists reject the idea of ownership of the buffalo, insisting on their freedom to roam across park, state, and even national boundaries. Although the focus of the film rests on these present-day actions to reestablish buffalo populations, Singing Back the Buffalo also does an excellent job of detailing the magnitude of destruction that nearly caused the extinction of buffalo in North America. White settlers and their governments reduced a population that once numbered in the millions down to several hundred, turning their grazing grounds into farmland and the buffalo themselves into leather, fertilizer, and other industrial goods. The film is particularly attentive to the way this destruction extended beyond the animals themselves to the spiritual and religious practices of native peoples. The Buffalo Child Stone (Mostos Awasis Asiniy to the Cree people), a stone sacred to several plains’ First Nations, was blown up by the Canadian government in order to build a dam. A photograph from the time shows a government worker standing atop the fragments, a crass contrast to another photograph from the film that depicts solemn Cree people holding what they know will be the last ceremony there. The film provides an opportunity for classes covering conservation and restoration to explore native-led projects. Singing Back the Buffalo is also recommended for ethnic studies and anthropology classes that explore ties between people, land, and ecology. The Buffalo Treaty seeks to restore populations in areas throughout the Canadian and U.S. plains. Public libraries in those areas should also consider adding the film to their holdings to encourage allyship and cooperative efforts. Awards:Y for Youth, Special Mention, DOXA Documentary Film Festival; Honorable Mention, Documentary Feature, Calgary International Film Festival
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,127 | 0,020 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».