Practice 9 Trauma-Informed Care: Centring Choice and Connection
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This chapter enhances cultural empowerment and trauma-informed care by centring cultural identities and relationality, culture-centred ways of knowing, and resources and strengths embedded in cultural communities. Melissa, Sandra, and Gwendolyn emphasize the important distinctions between trauma-informed care and trauma-centred practice. Trauma-informed care begins with understanding trauma in the context of sociocultural oppression and marginalization. Historical trauma (as ongoing colonial violence) and intergenerational trauma, for example, result in complex posttraumatic stress for Indigenous Peoples and communities. Other marginalized populations suffer the effects of political violence, including legalized racism. The authors caution that trauma and retraumatization can lead to a loss of cultural identity and relationality, which sometimes manifests in internalized oppression and lateral oppression. Gwendolyn uses the metaphor of a thick fog to describe the impacts of living with historical trauma. Melissa, Sandra, and Gwendolyn position trauma-informed listening as essential to cultural empowerment. Fostering cultural safety, trust, and care requires therapist relational presence and openness. The authors foster mind–body–Spirit–heart strength by honouring client voice and offering tools to foster safety and grounding. Melissa and Sandra have integrated practice illustrations by the following co-authors: • Joanna Gladue (Bigstone Cree Nation) opens the chapter with a Smudge, inviting readers into an ethical space in which Indigenous and western knowledge systems are both honoured. • Judy Chew draws on feminist therapy practices (e.g., collaboration, informed consent, power-sharing, power-analysis) to illustrate how to support clients struggling with internalized oppression to find their own voice. • Zuraida Dada continues her story of apartheid in South Africa as a political and economic strategy grounded in racism and cultural oppression, attending specifically to its intentions and lasting impacts. • Helen Ofosu speaks to the importance of being trauma-informed in the context of the workplace trauma of Black women through persistent or repeated marginalization. She raises awareness of racialized trauma resulting from noninclusive organizational cultures and leadership. • Ruth Strunz critiques the use of applied behavioural analysis in working with autistic clients through the lens of relational trauma. She describes how the intersection of trauma and systemic barriers impacts clients and limits their access to empathetic care. • Aaron Wong unpacks the legacy of racial discrimination within his own family history as Chinese immigrants who faced decades of government oppression. He reflects on the impact of intergenerational loss and trauma on his own health. • Gina Wong joins Sandra and Melissa in speaking to retraumatization as helping professionals. They share examples below of grounding rituals and energy-centred transitions that help them maintain personal well-being while staying present in the therapeutic space.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,014 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,038 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,018 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».