Practice 18 Pluralism: Collaborating in Health, Healing, and Care
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Practice 18 focuses on co-constructing microlevel change with individuals, couples, or families. Many of the culturally responsive and socially just (CRSJ) counselling practices in this book assume that there are multiple, inherently valid, and equally meaningful worldviews and approaches to health, healing, and care. Melissa and Sandra carry forward the lens of decolonizing praxis to disrupt eurocentric discourses and create space for new approaches. They also centre Indigenization to amplify Indigenous and other culture-centred approaches. The practice of Etuaptmumk guides their search for meaningful and helpful approaches that honour clients’ culture-centred views of health and healing. This epistemological pluralism enhances cultural responsivity in theory and practice. The authors return to a question posed earlier in the book: How can my collaboration with this person, facing that challenge, embedded in these contexts, best demonstrate client-centred, culturally affirming, and socially just care? They revisit the WISE Practices framework for responsible and ethical centring of Indigenous and other culture-centred approaches to health and healing (Practice 14). Four WISE Practices approaches are positioned on a continuum to encourage theoretical flexibility and cultural appreciation: (a) Wise Practices are culture-centred approaches to health, healing, and care based on localized ways of knowing, being, and doing; (b) integration applies the practice of Two-Eyed Seeing to construct new healing practices drawing on equally valid worldviews; (c) suitable adaptation requires creative collaboration to meaningfully shape conventional practices to client cultural identities and preferences; and finally (d) eurowestern approaches are offered with careful attention to building bridges across worldview. Embracing pluralism in health, healing, and care is where the art of health, healing, and care comes into play. Sandra and Melissa appreciate the contributions of the following co-authors to opening this chapter: • Ya Xi (Nancy) Lei speaks to her journey toward anti-racist practice, highlighting the gaps in representation and culturally relevant approaches throughout her education. • Marguerite Lengyell, Charlotte Finnigan, and Jason Brown share their reflections on privilege, positionality, and cultural humility, perspectives that shape and inform their work as therapists. Sandra and Melissa are also honoured to feature practice illustrations for each of the WISE Practices approaches by the following co-authors: • Darlene Auger offers an example of how Wise Practices embedded in the ways of knowing, doing, and being of her specific Indigenous heritage shaped her approach to health, healing, and care through the healing swing or Wîwîp’son nurturing therapy. • Adrienne Carter describes the creation of a mental health counselling and support program for refugees in which a team of helping professionals stepped outside of the box to adapt existing approaches to this specific population, creating a wholistic approach to family care. • Judy Chew models client empowerment through gender role analysis by being transparent about the underlying assumptions of feminist therapy and positioning the client as expert in assessing the goodness of fit. • Andrew Estefan recalls his early work with Daniel, a client whose story of life-making was supported through the thoughtful use of various narrative therapy techniques. • Mahdi Qasqas illustrates what it might look like to integrate eurowestern practices with sources of meaning-making and motivations for change from within a client’s Islamic worldview.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,027 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,022 | 0,077 |
| Communication savante | 0,021 | 0,024 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,026 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,010 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».