MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7155752433

EXAMINING THE SELECTIVE BEST PRACTICES OF INDIGENOUS LAND CLAIMS TO REMEDY EXISTING PROLONGED CHT LAND DISPUTE CRISIS

2020· dissertation· en· W7155752433 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rakiba N/A Nabi

Notice bibliographique

RevueKU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) · 2020
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueBangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCommissionIndigenousGovernment (linguistics)DoctrineLand lawBest practiceLand useRestitutionDispute resolution
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This dissertation is a multi-jurisdictional study on indigenous people’s land claims in the United States, South Africa, Canada, Australia, Brazil including regional and international systems like inter-American court of human rights. It explores the solution for Chittagong Hill Tracts Dispute Resolution Commission (CHT Commission) assessing the practices of selective countries. This thesis examines the federal trust doctrine applicable to Native American’s land regulation with the US federal government and assess how this unique system of land management help resolving the existing relationship with government and the present indigenous land dispute crisis in Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) Bangladesh. This study argues that trust doctrine is a helpful tool to govern government-community relationship and to impose liability upon government under certain circumstances. This study also considers the recognition and application of indigenous law or customary law in United States, South Africa, Canada, Australia, and Brazilian land controversy. Here, the work proposes a package of solutions. Like South Africa, formation of investigatory wing including historians, anthropologists and surveyors under Land Commission is a pragmatic approach to facilitate the commission’s functions. Another acceptable solution for CHT Land Commission is taking initiative for demarcating the indigenous land and its natural resources. Bangladesh could follow the South African demarcation process for the protection and development of aboriginal land. The jurisprudences of United States (Indian Claims Commission and Court of Federal Claims), South Africa, Brazil revealed that restoration of indigenous land does not always comes up as a best and practical solution. Rather, restitution to other suitable land and compensation for the lost land reflect as desirable outcomes having assessed the circumstances of each particular case. The factors for determining compensation are modus operandi to help the CHT Land Commission fixing land claims. Lastly, this study explores various international instruments, conventions and recommendations, case-laws, principles of customary law relating to indigenous land claims and its actual application in domestic implementation of CHT land claims. Considering the regional courts, this dissertation sums up that victim centered approach reverberates a panacea that reflects reparatory, restorative as well as communal justice for remedying dispossession. This research explains the ongoing individual and collective property rights violation occurred in Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) and the centuries-long stalemates arising out of various adverse projects of government continued between Bangladesh government and indigenous community, particularly Parbatyo Chattagram Jana Sanhati Samity (PCJSS). It addresses how discriminatory colonial and post-colonial policy and legislation gradually encroached CHT indigenous community’s traditional communal lands. In order to find out solutions for indigenous land claim, this study analyses the existing CHT Peace Accord 1997 between government and PCJSS and its aftermath, CHT Land Dispute Settlement Commission Act 2001 to demonstrate its contemporary standoff. It is true that Peace Treaty was a panacea to stabilize two-decade long internal conflicts. But it was unsatisfactory to resolve land disputes that mainly created incessant dispossession of indigenous community from their ancestral land since 1860 when the British annexed CHT to Bengal. This study analyses colonial and post-colonial state policies ignoring indigenous customary rights and the planned gradual settlement of Bengali people on CHT indigenous people’s traditional land under the auspices of government which aggravates the land dispute crisis. The cumulative effects of colonial and post-colonial forest policy created reserved forests, unclassed state forest that deprived CHT indigenous community losing vast majority of forest. Hostile government policy and discriminatory legislation gave rise to mismanagement and nationalization of forests. Against this backdrop, Chittagong Hill Tracts Land Dispute Resolution Commission is here, since its inception, to handle these sensitive and precarious problems. The long twenty-one years of procrastination to settle a single dispute and some discriminatory provisions in CHT Land Dispute Settlement Commission Act ultimately made the Commission a toothless, ineffective forum. Since the Commission has turned into an incompetent institution to settle land issue with government, the formal regulation of indigenous community’s relationship with government becomes a sine qua non to resolve the long-standing cold relationship between these two sections. The dissertation argues that CHT’s process for recognizing indigenous land rights can be informed by the experiences of indigenous peoples in the United States, Australia, Canada, Brazil and South Africa. Specifically, the CHT should adopt the federal trust relationship applicable to land disputes in the United States. Also, the CHT should be informed by the use of customary indigenous law recognized as well as formalized by South Africa. Restoring the ancestral land on the basis of pre-colonial entitlement (customary indigenous law) is a befitting mechanism that was followed by South African Land Claims Court and reflects an effective way out for CHT Land Commission. But this is not the only solution rather empowering the commission with a broad array of jurisdiction, diverse scope of awarding solution, considering no-holds-barred approach are well chosen to resolve the procrastination of CHT Land Commission.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,084
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,064
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueKU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas)Même sujetBangladesh Politics, Society, and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207