Tax Support Measures to Revitalize Individual Pensions: Focusing on the Implications of the Canadian Personal Pension System (RRSP)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Canada, one of the pension plans, the Registered Retirement Savings Plan (hereinafter referred to as the “RRSP”) is actively used under the government’s support to ensure abundant retirement income. Canada’s RRSP is one of the tax deferral methods that replaces taxes to be paid with pensions, which greatly contributes to ensuring retirement income. Recently, due to the rapid aging of Korea, the importance of guaranteeing income for the elderly is increasing compared to the past. However, retirement pensions and personal pensions, excluding public pensions, are not very active. Therefore, it is urgent to prepare various policy measures to revitalize retirement pensions and individual pensions. Therefore, this study examines RRSP, one of the Canadian personal pension systems, and suggests a plan to revitalize the Korean Individual Retirement Plan (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IRP’). It was intended to explore the implications of RRSP for Korea and to suggest various government support measures through this. Currently, Korea provides tax deductions only for the amount paid into personal pensions by the end of the year. However, the RRSP system in Canada allows additional payments to personal pension accounts without paying taxes to be paid by the end of the tax year, even if personal pensions are not paid by the end of the tax year. It operates a unique pension system that defers one’s taxable income and levies it at the time of actually receiving the pension. This not only reduces the tax burden but also greatly contributes to the guarantee of retirement income, so in Canada, it is becoming an essential personal pension system to guarantee retirement income. This system is expected to provide many implications for Korea’s personal pension system. In this study, I would like to argue as follows. First, it is necessary to enable post－payment in IRP. If the payment was made due to the payment limit in the previous year, a plan to allow additional payment in the following year should be considered. Second, retroactive payments should also be made possible in IRP. If payment was not made at all in the previous year, it is necessary to consider a plan that can be paid in addition to the previous year. Third, the person with income allows additional payments to the spouse. This study is meaningful in that it looked at cases of post－payment, retroactive payment, and additional payment of spouses in Canada as one of the support measures to guarantee retirement income in Korea.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».