MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7158911

Poetry on MTV? Slam and the Poetics of Popular Culture

2006· article· en· W7158911 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bronwen Low

Notice bibliographique

RevueJCT · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMusic History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryPoeticsGloryLiteratureBrotherMusicalSentimentalitySociologyArtHistoryLawAnthropology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

New York City's first-ever took place in April 1999. Thirty high-school aged poets competed in a mock-Olympic war of words, each poet's performance ranked on a scale of 1 to 10 by judges picked from the audience. In keeping with the principles of slam poetry, the poets used neither props nor musical instruments, relying instead on the expressiveness of their bodies and voices, and no performance could exceed a 3 1/2 minute time limit. The crowd actively participated in the poetry competition by hollering its approval and disagreement with the judges' scoring. The teen poets paraded on and off the stage, dread-locked and pony-tailed, braided and buzzed, some squeezed into stretch pants and baby T's, others, in the words of slam poet Patricia Smith, drooped in drapery. Iolet is tall, head-wrapped, and regal and told of police brutality. A boy from New Jersey dedicated his poem about being surrounded by a raging sea called heterosexuality to anyone who has ever felt left out of societies' categories, or been to a really boring sweet 16 party in Westchester county. There was a Puerto Rican nationalist poem, an ode to a mother and another to a brother locked up, and many tales of sex and heartbreak. Asheena McNeil, winner of the Teen Slam with a perfect score for her 125th Street Blues, credited rap music, and hip hop culture in general, as having made poetry cool. Rap is the most widespread and commercial branch of a larger movement known as word, a category used to describe forms of poetry and performance in which an artist recites (rather than sings) poetry, often to musical accompaniment that might range from a jazz ensemble to a bongo drummer. While spoken word had been confined principally to coffee houses and street corners, in the early 90's it went mass-market and--media as MTV and Much Music began to televise performance poetry, broadcasting clips of poets in-between music videos. word continues to take new forms: in December, 2001, HBO began airing Def Poetry Jam (co-produced by Russell Simmons and rapper Mos Def), a half hour of spoken word poetry hosted by Mos Def that featured in its first few episodes eminent African-American poets Nikki Giovanni and Amiri Baraka, slam poetry veteran Taylor Mali, and celebrities such as Jewel. In 2003 Def Poetry Jam took shape as a Broadway play. Performance poetry also hit the road, touring the United States and Canada with the music festival Lollapalooza and as the star of MTV's Spoken Word Unplugged concerts. This phenomenon of popular poetry is well documented journalistically; (1) media interest has focused on the dynamic and competitive slam poetry movement. Started in the mid 80's at the Get Me High bar in Chicago, poetry slams now take place across North America, and culminate each year in the National Slam. In 2004, 270 poets in 69 teams from cities across the United States and Canada met in St. Louis to vie for the title of Grand Slam champions. In this paper, I make the case that spoken word holds important lessons for curriculum on how contemporary youth communicate, express themselves, and make meaning, through practices constituting what might be thought of as a counter- literacy--outside the formal practices of literacy, pedagogy, and curriculum, and evolving out of exclusion, necessity, and improvised pleasure. But I also build a larger argument for curriculum studies about popular culture as a central site for understanding cultural change. I do both through a study of some slam poetry texts: the film Slam (1998), which brought the poetic genre to a cinema audience; its accompanying anthology, which includes the screenplay and written versions of its poetry; and the anthology ALOUD: Voices from the Nuyorican Poets Cafe (1994), the first collection of slam verse, from one of the central performance poetry venues in the United States. Why has spoken word become such a cultural force? I propose that spoken word is so topical, so central to the present cultural moment, because it anticipates forms and theories of language and poetics, sets of communicative conditions and relations, and in turn, new forms of identity and community which are not quite yet, which are in the process of evolving, especially within proliferating contexts of new information and communication technologies and under conditions of globalization. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,046
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,091

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,005
Communication savante0,0050,004
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,184
Écart entre enseignants0,172 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJCTMême sujetMusic History and CultureTravaux en français237 207