MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7160636500 · doi:10.25959/29133215.v1

Understanding and assessing health literacy development in primary school children

2024· dissertation· W7160636500 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claire Otten

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Tasmania · 2024
Typedissertation
Langue
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth literacyLiteracyHealth educationCurriculumHealth promotionPublic healthHealth equityHealth policy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<b>Background:</b> The development of health literacy is a key means of reducing health inequities and improving health outcomes globally. Health education during childhood has been identified as crucial for the development of health literacy. Developing health literacy in childhood may benefit the child both at the time and into adulthood. Although adult health literacy has been previously examined, little is understood about how best to support health literacy development in educational settings throughout the critical childhood period. <br><b>Aims:</b> The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate mechanisms that support children’s health literacy development in educational settings. This thesis first sought to develop an approach to analyse international curricula for their ability to support and implement health literacy development, and then demonstrate this method through the analysis of the Australian, British Columbian (Canada), and New Zealand curricula. Second, the thesis aimed to gain a greater understanding of the characteristics of health education that best promote health literacy development, through the systematic review and synthesis of existing international literature. Third, it sought to assess the ethical acceptability of a health literacy professional development program, via case-study of the Australian <i>HealthLit4Kids</i> program. Fourth, this thesis aimed to develop a valid and reliable approach to teacher-led assessment of children’s health literacy that may be transferable to international contexts. Finally, Australian primary school teachers’ opinions of this health literacy assessment approach were obtained to determine the suitability, acceptability, and feasibility of the approach in their teaching practice. <br><b>Methods/Results:</b> Through five interrelated studies, the best ways to support children’s health literacy development were explored, using Thijs and van den Akker’s (2009) Levels of Curriculum framework (i.e., intended, implemented, and attained curriculum). <br><i>Intended Curriculum – Study One</i> <br>The first aim of this thesis was addressed through the creation of a framework within which health curricula could be analysed. A framework comprised of Nutbeam’s (2000) Levels of Health Literacy and Hjelm’s (2010) Dimensions of Health was created and then used to perform content analysis on the Australian, British Columbian, and New Zealand health and physical education curricula to determine their capacity to support childhood health literacy development. The curriculum analysis showed that learning descriptors that were related to social and physical health occurred the most commonly across the three curricula studied, with less emphasis on emotional and spiritual health. Additionally, across all three curricula, interactive health literacy skills were most frequently included in learning descriptors, whereas critical health literacy skills were less common. <br><i>Implemented Curriculum – Studies Two and Three </i><br>Study Two involved a systematised review of the available literature to qualitatively examine the characteristics of health education that best promote health literacy development internationally. The review revealed six core characteristics of education that have been reported to promote health literacy development in primary school classrooms: collaboration, contextualisation, accessibility, autonomy, reflectiveness, and continuity. In the included studies, a range of methods were used to report, measure, or assess children’s health literacy development. There was found to be a lack of valid and reliable health literacy measures for children aged twelve years and under. <br>In Study Three, the ethical imperative to develop health literacy and the implementation of professional development programs for teachers were assessed, by applying Spike’s four principles for public health ethics. The assessment used the World Health Organization recognised <i>HealthLit4Kids</i> program as a case study. This study concluded that an ethical imperative exists for primary school teachers to invest in their students’ health literacy development.<i> HealthLit4Kids</i> was demonstrated to be an ethically acceptable health literacy professional development program. <br><i>Attained Curriculum – Studies Four and Five</i> <br>A valid and reliable approach to health literacy measurement is necessary to extend the current understanding of the pedagogical strategies that best facilitate children’s health literacy development. Study Four presents a health literacy assessment framework, using contemporary health literacy and educational research, as well as the key components of assessment (outcome of interest, and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data) to guide the discussion. The Australian Curriculum was used as a case study to demonstrate the approach in practice. <br>Using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, Study Five assessed primary school teachers’ opinions of the suitability, acceptability, and feasibility of the framework. It was found that teachers were familiar with creating rubrics. However, the approach described in Study Four may only be suitable in schools where generalist teachers are responsible for the teaching of health education and assessment of health literacy. Teachers interviewed had positive views regarding the framework (acceptability) but believed that barriers such as a lack of allocated time and confidence could hinder feasibility. Additional resources, further professional development, and the clear allocation of teaching time and responsibility were suggested to support the adoption of the approach among generalist teachers in the Australian primary school setting.<br><b>Conclusion:</b> A curricular approach to health literacy assessment provides a potential solution to the measurement of children's health literacy, addressing the limitations associated with current measurement instruments. However, the approach relies on the delivery of a comprehensive health curriculum and on teachers who have the capacity, capability, and confidence to implement the framework in practice. This thesis demonstrates how curricula can be analysed and improved for their ability to support health literacy development. It also shows how health literacy professional development programs for teachers can be examined for their ethical acceptability. Further, the current work provides insight into the barriers and facilitators that teachers may experience when implementing the health literacy assessment framework. The thesis thus provides the critical groundwork for future research focused on childhood health literacy development, teacher professional development, and teacher assessment of children’s health literacy development.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,423
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,003
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,077
Tête enseignante GPT0,385
Écart entre enseignants0,308 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of TasmaniaMême sujetHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityTravaux en français237 207