MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7161422521 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20244479

Phaeoisaria sparsa B. Sutton, Mycol. Pap.

2025· article· W7161422521 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. (Martina) Réblová, J. Nekvindová, M. Hernández-Restrepo, M. Hradilová, M. Kolařík

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueLichen and fungal ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConidiumMargin (machine learning)HyphaSporeMycelium

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Phaeoisaria sparsa B. Sutton, Mycol. Pap. 132: 87. 1973. Fig. 10. Description on the natural substrate: See Sutton (1973) and Hughes (1978). Culture characteristics: On CMD colonies 27–29 mm diam., circular, raised with a flat margin, margin entire, funiculose, cobwebby to mucoid towards the periphery, white-beige, margin isabelline, reverse isabelline. On MLA colonies 20–21 mm diam., circular, slightly convex, margin finely undulate, velvety, furrowed, grey, margin olivaceous grey, reverse dark olivaceous grey. On OA colonies 31–33 mm diam., circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby to mucoid, farinose with sparse funiculose ropes of hyphae at the margin, olivaceous brown, beige towards the periphery, reverse olivaceous brown. On PCA colonies 28–30 mm diam., circular, raised with a flat margin, margin entire, velvety, funiculose at the inoculation block, white-beige, creamy at the margin, reverse pale brown. Sporulation was abundant on CMD, MLA and PCA, moderate on OA. Description in culture: Colonies on CMD effuse. Mycelium composed of hyaline, subhyaline to brown, septate hyphae, 1.5–2.5 μm wide. Synnemata absent. Conidiophores macronematous, semi-macronematous or reduced to a single conidiogenous cell. Conidiogenous cells 5–18 × 2–3.5 µm, integrated, terminal and intercalary, polyblastic, sympodially extending, oval, cylindrical to subulate, hyaline, smooth, with several denticles, 1.5 × 0.5 µm; conidiogenesis holoblastic-denticulate. Conidia solitary, dry, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, with one or two large guttules, with a truncate basal scar, secession schizolytic, of two types (formed on all media): 5.5–8 × 2–2.5 µm (mean ± SD = 7.2 ± 0.7 × 2.2 ± 0.2 μm), on MLA 4.5–7.5 × 2–3 µm (mean ± SD = 6.1 ± 0.8 × 2.6 ± 0.3 μm), oblong to elongate clavate, straight or slightly curved, rounded at the apex, hyaline, aseptate; 3–3.5 × 1.5–2 µm (mean ± SD = 3.4 ± 0.3 × 1.7 ± 0.2 μm), on MLA 3.5–4.5 × 1.5–3 µm (mean ± SD = 3.8 ± 0.4 × 2.2 ± 0.4 μm), guttuliform to dacryoid; sporulation associated with the aerial part of the colony. Sexual morph not observed. Material examined: Spain, Aragón, Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park, Torla, on dead twig, 23 Mar. 2011, M. Hernández-Restrepo & J. Gené, culture FMR 11939. Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe, originally described from decaying bark of Acer spicatum, with additional reports from decaying wood of various deciduous trees, e.g. Alnus sp., Betula papyrifera, Corylus sp., Populus tremuloides, Populus balsamifera, Salix sp. in Canada, New Zealand, and Spain (Sutton 1973, MyCoPortal, this study). According to GlobalFungi database, this species was the second most abundant within the genus, detected in 66 samples. Most records originated from forests and woodlands (83 %), followed by anthropogenic habitats (10 %), croplands (5.7 %), and to a lesser extent, grasslands and desert biomes (1.3 %). The majority of samples were soil-related (66 %), with additional occurrences from dead organic matter (17 %), air (9 %), and roots or shoots (7 %). The samples predominantly originated from temperate zones across three continents: North America (USA), Europe (Czech Republic, Belgium, Germany, Latvia, Estonia, Italy, Spain, Sweden), and East Asia (China, South Korea). Two exceptions included records from Mediterranean climates (Seville, Spain) and a single occurrence in the Antarctic polar zone. Notes: In our phylogenetic analyses, P. sparsa is represented by strain FMR 11939, isolated from a dead twig in Spain (Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2017). Our material corresponds well with the protologue (Sutton 1973) based on observations on natural substrate: synnemata 220–250 × 17–28 µm, conidiogenous cells 15–20.5 × 3–3.5 µm with denticles 1.5–2 × 0.5 µm, and conidia 12–17 × 2.5–3.5 µm. It is well defined by its 0–3-septate, fusiform to oblong-clavate conidia and subulate conidiogenous cells, which are mostly confined to the apices of the synnemata, giving them a somewhat penicillate appearance. In culture, the synnemata were absent and the fungus produced two types of conidia differing in shape and size (oblong to elongate clavate and guttuliform to dacryoid), a feature also observed in P. parallela. In culture, the conidia were consistently aseptate. Furthermore, in culture, the size and shape of both conidial types were comparable across all media, although on MLA, the oblong to elongate conidia were slightly shorter, while the guttuliform to dacryoid conidia were slightly longer (see description). The longer conidia, although comparable in shape to those on the natural substrate, were shorter in culture (5.5–8 × 2–2.5 µm on CMD, 4.5–7.5 × 2–3 µm on MLA). Phaeoisaria sparsa is similar to P. parallela in conidial characteristics; however, both species are morphologically well differentiated. As only ITS and LSU sequences of the strain FMR 11939 were available in GenBank, we generated sequences from other gene regions to complete its molecular dataset. The combined morphological and molecular differences support the recognition of P. parallela and P. sparsa as distinct species. For a detailed morphological comparison of both species, see the notes under the description of P. parallela.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,117

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,004
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0350,055

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetLichen and fungal ecology→Travaux en français237 207→