MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7161679786 · doi:10.59236/emro.v27i7a420

Bring Them Home (Aiskótáhkapiyaaya)

2025· article· W7161679786 sur OpenAlex
Cori Biddle

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTribeFace (sociological concept)CriticismCultural identityIdentity (music)ParallelsParticipant observationIndigenousVariety (cybernetics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Distributed by The Video Project, 145 - 9th St., Suite 230, San Francisco, CA 94103; 800-475-2638Produced by Lily GladstoneDirected by Daniel Glick, Ivan MacDonald, and Ivy MacDonald2024, Streaming, 85 mins Bring Them Home (Aiskótáhkapiyaaya) documents the efforts of Blackfeet on both sides of the Canadian/United States border to bring buffalo back to at least part of their traditional ranges, and back to their central role in Blackfeet culture. The parallels between the devastating effects that colonization had for both groups (buffalo and Blackfeet) are also seen in how each group can heal each other: restoring an important aspect of identity back to the Blackfeet and reintroducing the buffalo’s positive impact as a keystone species in their habitat. Attempts to re-introduce buffalo back to Blackfeet lands (in both the US and Canada) began in the late 1970s through to the 1990s, largely by tribal councils or individual council members. However, they were met with pushback and criticism by tribal members who largely relied on cattle ranching, and leasing grazing land, for income. Interviews highlight the conflict between the more western way of living (historically forced upon the tribe) and their traditional relationship with the buffalo. After three failed attempts at the Blackfeet Reservation in Montana, the tribe began the Iinnii Initiative and the Blackfeet Buffalo Program to promote the cultural importance of the buffalo and host community events to celebrate their heritage and connection. This program also gave tribal members a chance to interact face to face with the buffalo, which had been absent from the area since the 19th century. These grassroots efforts led to a fourth attempt to release free roaming buffalo in the reservation in 2016, but it was not until 2023 that bureaucracy and political will led to the designation of grazing land dedicated to the buffalo, and their release. The film shows the struggle and dedication of the tribe to reconnect to their heritage and legacy after centuries of oppression and hostility by Europeans. And the ways they are finding to adapt to their modern circumstances (like cattle ranching) while making space for a cultural identity (the buffalo) that was purposefully denied to them. The process is not easy and not quick, but as is said in the documentary, “Indian time” means that a thing happens when it is supposed to happen. And the film ends with hope that the buffalo, and the Blackfeet, can return to at least part of their ancestral way of life. This film is highly recommended for high school and undergraduate courses. The quality of the documentary, both visually and in its dedication to current interviews and archival footage/images, makes it easy for the audience to engage with the story. It would be an excellent component of a variety of US history, sociology, cultural studies, political science, or even ecology/environment studies related courses. As an example, it could be a powerful way to start conversations on the consequences of colonialism, maintaining cultural identity, or habitat restoration. Awards:Big Sky International Film Festival, Big Sky Award; BlackStar Film Festival, Directing Award for Climate Storytelling; Nevada City Film Festival, Best Score; Weyauwega International Film Festival, Best Documentary; San Diego International Film Festival, Audience Choice Award / Special Indigenous Award; Palm Springs International Film Festival, Best of Fest, Audience Choice; Jackson Wild Media Awards, Honorable Mention; Montana International Film Festival, Best Documentary; Capital City Film Festival, Best Documentary

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,200
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0320,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle