Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Distributed by Bullfrog Films, PO Box 149, Oley, PA 19547; 800-543-FROG (3764)Produced by Jane Dawson Shang and Tandiwe NjobeDirected by Kate Geis2024, Streaming, 87 mins The United Nations has published their Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 5 is to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. This film shows what can happen when you empower women. The best way to do that is through education. These young women were raised in South Africa under the apartheid system. They received scholarships to attend Smith College, a private liberal arts women’s college in Massachusetts. This scholarship program began in the late 1980’s as South Africa was seriously beginning to change (apartheid ended in 1994). The women speak openly about their experiences. They talk about the differences that they encountered - everything from New England winters to people who were not afraid to speak their minds. Their experiences made them question things that they had considered normal all their lives. However, they also held events to help them keep in touch with their home culture and to share it with other students. The film begins with 30 minutes of examination of life under apartheid and the South African struggle for freedom. It is interesting and engaging using a combination of archival photos and news video. The entire film flows smoothly and should easily hold the attention of viewers. You are also likely to notice some similarities with today’s news stories such as student protestors insisting that a college divest itself of all investments in an unpopular country (South Africa, then; Israel, now). This film could be useful in many different classes including Gender Studies, African Studies, and History. I recommend this film because it makes a clear and engaging case for the power of education to change both individual lives and the world. Many of these women had been told as children that education was the way out of poverty and apartheid. Education gives you options and opportunities. Some went home after college to be part of the change. Some stayed in the U.S. The experience was not easy but, as one put it, you have to have a willingness to be uncomfortable. Awards:Best International Documentary, Best Director of an International Documentary, & Best Original Score of an International Documentary, Hollywood North Film Awards; Honorable Mention, LA Independent Women Film Awards; Outstanding Excellence, Depth of Field International Film Festival; Award Winner, Toronto Women Film Festival
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,450 | 0,309 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».