Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Heather Courtney and Paul SteklerDirected by Heather Courtney2023, Streaming, 36 mins For the Record follows editor Laurie Ezzell Brown and the small staff of the Canadian Record, the local newspaper of Canadian, Texas. Ezzell Brown as a subject is the perfect link between past, present and future; her father ran the newspaper before her, and as she nears retirement, she recounts how much her father poured into the paper (even at his own expense), seeks to uphold its mission without letting it wring her dry, and searches for the next editor in line. New leadership isn’t the only uncertainty, though; the future of the paper itself could be in jeopardy. For the Record details the factors destabilizing this newspaper, such as a decline in ad sales due to free advertising opportunities on social media and consumers’ expectation of free, 24-hour news updates. The documentary thereby serves as an excellent primer on the changes affecting local and print journalism across the U.S. For the Record also covers negative reactions to the paper’s reporting of events like presidential elections and the COVID-19 pandemic. In the conservative-majority city of Canadian, the Record’s staff has, for its entire existence, received pushback, sometimes violent. However, For the Record avoids a simple “media vs. community” divide by reminding viewers that the staff of the Record are deeply embedded in their community. It would be easy to paint Canadian, Texas with a broad brush, but both the paper and the documentary illuminate nuances in the city’s identity. A few testimonials from community members reveal gratitude for the paper, and some community members don’t mind that the paper expresses different views than their own; more of these testimonials could have deepened the documentary’s look at how the newspaper exists in the minds of the community. In another segment of particularly stark contrast, the film moves from the commissioner’s court in which it is announced that no one in Canadian has been hospitalized with COVID-19, suggesting that the threat of the virus is decreasing, to Ezzell Brown in the following weeks compiling stories of cases in nursing homes, a quarantined high school football team, and hospitalizations. Ezzell Brown and her staff have a personal and principled connection to these stories, which is portrayed as an asset; they are motivated to tell the story of their city to the city itself, in a sense helping the community members talk to each other. For the Record can help introduce learners to fundamental concepts in reporting, the impact of local news, the changing news landscape, and threats to reliable news access in small communities. It could have been strengthened by more engagement with threads like the search for a new editor, but as a human-centered introduction to issues in journalism, it excels. And it doesn’t hurt that the staff of the Record are witty, driven, and familial, inviting the viewer to experience the lifelong bond of a small community like that in Canadian, Texas. Awards:Reel South Award, New Orleans Film Festival
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».