A systemic, mixed-method exploration of resilience factors for rural indigenous youth
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Although the dynamic between culture and resilience is complex due to the ongoing effects of colonial oppression and historical trauma (Gone, 2013; Kirmayer et al., 2014; O'Neill et al., 2018; Yellow Horse Brave Heart, 2003), resilience is generally thought to be inherent within Indigenous cultures and values (Feinstein et al., 2009; Kirmayer et al., 2011; LaFromboise et al., 2006). The considerable variability among Indigenous Nations and cultures necessitates a focus on resilience factors within community-specific contexts (Ungar et al., 2007). The focus of this program of research was resilience among youth who participated in a career exploration program and lived in select rural Indigenous communities in Treaty 2 in Manitoba, Canada. Resilience processes were explored by analyzing the dynamics between risks and protective factors and their developmental outcomes. This manuscript is divided into two connected, yet separate, manuscripts. In the first manuscript, we explored resilience within the framework of Chandler and Lalonde’s (1998; 2008) concept of cultural continuity with a study of the concept of self across time in relation to cultural community. The findings from a battery of self-report measures indicated that positive self-concepts and seeing oneself as connected to the future was associated with connectedness and relationships with caregivers, siblings, friends, communities, and culture. The findings support the notion that cultural continuity (Chandler & Lalonde, 2008), or community and familial connectedness, is associated with more positive self-concepts in the present and future. In the second manuscript, we further explored resilience processes among the participants by examining how connectedness to one’s cultures, families, and communities (Beverly et al., 2012; Snowshoe et al., 2017; Ungar et al., 2008) was associated with the youths’ capacity for resilience. This project was completed using a mixed-methods, photo-elicitation research approach with a smaller group of participants. The findings indicated ways that connectedness to people, places, and culture contributed to the youths’ capacity for resilience. The variables of being connected to and receiving support from relationships were the most impactful resilience factors. This study aligned with evidence that connectedness can be considered an integral component of building resilience capacity for Indigenous youth. Taken together, the findings from this program of research highlighted how developmental outcomes are positively associated with connectedness to people and relationships, culture, and community, as well as to individual characteristics of resilience. The findings are informative for providing opportunities for success and well-being of Indigenous youth in the face of historical and ongoing oppressive colonization
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».