Towards improving species distribution models and vulnerability assessments of Canadian birds
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Climate change is set to impact biodiversity around the globe. In response, pole-wards range shifts are being observed ubiquitously, leading to range contraction for species already living at northern latitudes, such as birds breeding in northern Canada. Any pole-wards shift by these species, or from other species moving up from the south, will cause range contraction and increased extinction risk. Canadian birds are experiencing climate-driven change faster than anywhere else in the world, making it critical to understand the magnitude of change they will experience in the future. Species distribution models (SDMs) are the most commonly used tool to understand the incoming climate-driven changes. Inferring from associations between observational occurrences and environmental data, these models are used to predict potential species distribution with future climate scenarios. However, many different distribution models have been developed, each based on different assumptions and better suited for different types of data. The Canadian north is a particular challenge, as it has rapid climate change and very sparse distribution data. While most SDMs are based only on occurrence data, some new approaches combine occurrences with abundances from systematic survey data, which could be a solution to having reliable models in under-sampled regions. In addition to projected species range shifts, species traits are well-known to be correlates for extinction risk. Combining SDMs with traits could provide a framework for understanding a species ability to cope or adapt to climate-driven change as well as changes in habitat suitability and identify vulnerable species not currently deemed at-risk.In this thesis, I first address the question of how to integrate climate-change projections into a trait vulnerability assessment (TVA) framework. This new framework evaluates how much climate change a species is experiencing (i.e., how much suitable habitat they are predicted to lose and gain), which is then combined with species-specific traits. Species traits represent sensitivity, exposure, and adaptive capacity to climate change. By incorporating both SDM and TVA, I assessed the overall vulnerability of the 471 birds breeding in Canada and highlighted 83 species not currently at-risk, but likely to become vulnerable in the future given their combined changing distributions and capacity to withstand these changes.Secondly, I ask how different data types can be leveraged to address data-deficiencies when predicting species distributions. I test a recently developed method of combining abundance and occurrence data for waterfowl of the western boreal region of Canada, where both types of data are limited and biased in different ways. I compare four different types of data and approaches including: (1) abundance data from the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey (WBPHS), (2) occurrence data derived from abundance data from WBPHS, (3) occurrence data weighted by abundance, and (4) occurrence data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). I find that the simple method of model integration (occurrence data weighted by abundances) produces better predictions than individual models. I also determine which models are most appropriate depending on species rarity.Overall, I find that an improved understanding of extinction risk is possible even in the rapidly-changing under-studied Canadian north, but we must leverage all available information to have reliable predictions of species risk
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».