Nutritional status and response to immunotherapy in lung cancer patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the past years, lung cancer has become the single largest cause of cancer deaths in developed countries. Because it remains subclinical for a long time and the symptoms are commonly non-specific, patients are usually diagnosed at advanced stages of disease. This situation limits treatment options, but immune checkpoint inhibitors are an effective treatment for many patients. This type of drug works by counteracting the mechanisms that tumors develop to evade the immune system control and elicit proliferation and action of cytotoxic T-cells to kill tumor cells. Despite the effectiveness of this therapy once the immune system action is re-established, more than half of the lung cancer patients receiving it do not respond to therapy. As the gut microbiome and the nutritional status of patients have been extensively related to outcomes in cancer and to the integrity of the immune system, they can have a prognostic value to predict the response a given patient will have to cancer treatment and to evaluate their candidacy for the therapy. In addition, the patients’ diet modulates both their gut microbiome and nutritional status. To date, combining data from gut microbiome, nutritional status and dietary intake has not been attempted to find combinations of these features that may predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer patients.The aim of this study was to generate a data model that integrated relevant diet, nutritional status and microbiome factors to predict immune checkpoint blockade response in lung cancer patients. To establish the features of body weight, body composition, dietary intake and gut microbiome, related to cancer outcomes (survival and response to therapy), a dataset from Valencia, Spain (n=69) was analyzed and the same analyses were performed using an independent cohort of 266 non-small cell lung cancer patients from Montreal, as a pre-modeling step. Comparisons among the two cohorts were performed and the final variables to include in the modeling phase were chosen. Modeling was carried out using the Montreal dataset only and using Cox-proportional hazard regression as the statistical approach and Archetypal Analysis as the machine-learning approach.After adjusting for EGFR-mutation status, ECOG status and PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, body mass index and skeletal muscle mass were found to be non-independent predictors of progression-free survival, with higher values being protective against lung cancer progression risk (Body mass index: HR=0.95, 95%CI=[0.924–0.987], p<0.01; skeletal muscle: HR=0.99, 95%CI=[0.992–0.999], p=0.01). Further data modeling using archetypal analysis revealed patterns for progression after immune checkpoint blockade administration that incorporated the relative abundance of five bacterial species, body composition variables, body mass index and macronutrients intake. Three patterns (archetypes) were found that explain subgroups of patients with different characteristics across all the variables included related to their progression after therapy administration. In the pre-modeling phase and in the archetypal analysis higher values of body mass index, skeletal muscle and higher relative abundance of Monoglobus pectinilyticus associated with better response to therapy, whilst higher relative abundance of Streptococcus spp. associated with non-response.This study showed that combinations of gut microbiome, dietary intake and nutritional status features along with other clinical variables can be used to assess response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy in lung cancer
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».