MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7161814880 · doi:10.82308/41537

The impact of family transformations on intergenerational ties, caregiving and care receiving in Canada

2015· dissertation· en· W7161814880 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
France-Pascale Ménard

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFertilityBaby boomAffect (linguistics)National Survey of Family GrowthDiversification (marketing strategy)Family lifeLife course approachPaternal careExtended family

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the last decades, families in Canada have experienced profound changes, marked by the decline in fertility and a rise in conjugal instability. These changes will inevitably affect the provision of care for tomorrow’s elderly, more specifically for the large baby-boom generation, those born between 1946 and 1965, who will all have crossed the threshold of age 65 in the next fifteen years. Despite the large number of studies on aging conducted in Canada and in other Western countries, the effects of the diversification of parental and conjugal trajectories on the support and care provided to seniors remain poorly understood. This is the main objective of this dissertation, which aims to examine the effects of family transformations on intergenerational relationships and eldercare. In the first chapter, we analyse the conjugal and parental trajectories that Canadian men and women born between 1923 and 1972 experienced throughout their lives, highlighting the differences observed across cohorts and gender. We run a series of life tables, using data from Statistics Canada’s General Social Survey’s (GSS) on family transitions (cycle 20), conducted in 2006. Our analysis shows that men and women born during the baby boom were more likely than their predecessors to go through multiple conjugal transitions and to do so earlier in their life. They were also more likely than previous generations to remain childless. Furthermore, they were more inclined to experience family life in a stepfamily. In the second chapter, we first estimate the impact of family transformations on the maintenance of intergenerational ties, measured as the frequency of contact between parents and their adult children. We further examine whether the probability to receive care if needed and the source of care (informal or formal) received due to a long-term health problem or physical limitation are influenced by individuals’ parental and conjugal trajectories. We run multivariate logistic regressions, using data from Statistics Canada’s 2007 (cycle 21) GSS on family, social support and retirement. Our results show that the maintenance of intergenerational ties varies depending on prior family events. We observe that the reception of care also varies depending on prior family events, and that the effect of current conjugal status depends on the number of unions experienced. In the third chapter, we analyze the effects of family transformations on the provision of care. We run multivariate sequential logistic regressions, using data from the 2007 GSS. These regressions explore the odds of, first, providing care as opposed to not providing care and, second, of providing care to kin (or a parent) rather than to non-kin (or a person other than a parent) among those who did so. Our results show that some characteristics of the respondents’ family of origin, most particularly having at least one parent alive and living in geographic proximity to one’s parents, strongly increase the odds of providing care and of helping a family member. Our results suggest that individuals’ past and current family experience has little effect on the provision of care among men, but has some effect for women. We note that women who were not in a union due to separation or widowhood have smaller odds of providing care to a kin member than those still in their first union. In summary, the results of the last two chapters of this dissertation suggest that the increase of family diversity and instability, as documented in the first chapter, may undermine intergenerational ties and the provision of eldercare in the future.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,103
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,744

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,001
Communication savante0,0030,001
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,305
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving→Travaux en français237 207→