Sharp-tailed grouse «Tympanuchus phasianellus» in a resource development area at the northern edge of the species' range
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The reproductive phenology and habitat requirements of sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus) are not well understood. Northern populations of sharp-tailed grouse (STGR) belonging to the Tympanuchus phasianellus caurus subspecies are particularly under-studied. Although the caurus subspecies is thought to be stable, beyond anecdotal sightings, little is known regarding STGR status or habitat requirements and tolerance to disturbance in the northern parts of its range. The present study focuses on a STGR population located in North-Central Yukon in and around the Klondike Goldfields. Female STGR were fitted with radio transmitters and monitored during the reproductive period over three study years (2015-2017) to quantify habitat use around identified lek sites during the nesting and brood-rearing periods, analyze the habitat selection of nesting and brood-rearing hens, and assess habitat effects on hatching and fledgling success. Among 41 radio-collared hens, nearly all attempted to nest (96.4% ± 2.5) and clutch size averaged 8.3 ± 2.1. Overall apparent nest success for all nests was 76.4% ± 1.9 (n = 39). Nest sites were situated where a shrub layer provided vertical cover and abundant bunchgrass understory provided horizontal cover. Survival was higher for early hatching nests in sites with fewer hummocks than later hatch nests with many hummocks. Brood rearing hens selected for habitats with mesic vegetation such as scrub birch and sedges, but also showed a preference for sites classified as dry rather than wet. Brood failure occurred less often within low elevation, sloping sites with abundant deadfall cover and more often within sites on south and east facing slopes with less deadfall. During both the nesting and brood rearing periods, hens did not select for shrub dominated sites equally; those with shrubs less than 2m in height were preferred over taller shrubs and avoidance increased as the successional stage progressed to maturing forest. Home range sizes (163.0 ± 52.9 ha, using 95% kernel density) were larger and distances traveled from the nest site to brood rearing habitat (1119.2 ± 187.9 m) were longer than previously described for STGR and other prairie grouse. Hen survival in the Klondike Goldfields during the reproductive period was 64.2% ± 6.2 (n = 70), with most mortality occurring during egg laying and incubation. The current research has helped advance our understanding of the phenological events, space use and habitat selection of an isolated populations of a lekking bird species in a resource development region, and characterize the importance, scale, and inter-relatedness of three major impacts - mining activity, fire history, and predators – on STGR survival and reproductive success in the Klondike Goldfields
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».