Non-oxidative methane activation over molybdenum and tungsten nitrides
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The abundance of natural gas (methane) has gained enormous attention towards its use as a feedstock replacement in petrochemical industries. Canada is one world’s top chemical and plastic manufacturing industries. Ethylene and aromatics are used largely (52% and 30% respectively) as feedstocks in petrochemical industries. Due to volatile oil price and its depletion, it makes it essential for refiners to look for a reliable feed replacement for optimum revenue, making methane gas a good candidate.Direct non-oxidative conversion of methane to olefins and aromatics can be a potential alternative to the conventional intermediate synthesis-gas production route. This process does not produce greenhouse gas and could also be used for clean hydrogen gas production. However, activation of the C–H bonds in CH4 is extremely challenging and thermodynamically limited, requiring high temperatures (700–1000°C) and an efficient catalyst. Also, selectivity and coking of the catalyst are considered a major challenge. In this master’s thesis, the metal catalysts chosen are Ga, Mo, and W. Each of these metals has shown to be active towards methane activation. Metal nitrides are an alternative to noble-metal catalysts; our group has recently reported catalytic activity of gallium nitride towards methane activation. In this study, the catalytic performance of Mo, W, and mixed-metal Mo/W nitrides was investigated. The effect of atomic ratios of Mo and W on the methane conversion, product selectivity, and coke formation was evaluated. The study on gallium nitride catalyst and its regeneration capability was studied as collaborative work.The metal and mixed-metal nitride catalysts were synthesized via impregnation of the corresponding precursors onto SBA-15 with a total target metal loading of 4 wt% and varying atomic ratios between Mo and W. Impregnated catalysts were dried and subsequently calcined at 750°C to form metal oxides. Prior to the methane activation experiments, the metal oxides were either reduced in H2 at the 700°C for 1 h or nitridated under NH3 gas at 700°C for 3 h to form the corresponding metal nitrides. Reduction, nitridation, and activity experiments were carried out in the same fixed bed reactor setup at the same temperature (700°C) and GHSV of 1160 h−1 at 1 barabs. The product gas mixture was analyzed via a calibrated mass spectrometer, while the amount of coke was determined via temperature-programmed oxidation in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA). The catalysts were characterized using N2 adsorption/desorption, chemisorption, DRIFTS, XRD, SEM-EDS, and XPS to understand the structure-activity relationship.The methane conversion to hydrocarbons along with the coke formation and product selectivity of the catalysts were evaluated. Mo, W, and MoW catalysts have higher activity than the corresponding nitrides with Mo and MoN achieving a CH4 conversion to hydrocarbon values of 0.85 % and 0.55%, respectively. W and WN catalysts are slightly less active with CH4 conversions of 0.55% and 0.14%, respectively. Despite the lower CH4 conversion, the metal nitrides have a much lower coke formation and a much higher selectivity towards ethylene as aromatic species are more prone for coke formation. The lowest coke deposition was 8 mgCoke gCat−1 on WN/SBA-15 for the nitride compared to 110 mgCoke gCat−1 for the metal catalysts. The C2H4 selectivity is greatly increased with the relative amount of W. Mo and MoN achieve C2H4 selectivity of 10% and almost zero, respectively, while W and WN achieve 25% and 42% C2H4 selectivity. The highest C2H4 selectivity of 65% was reached with the mixed-metal nitride catalyst containing Mo:W ratio of 5:1. Using TGA, it was shown that the gallium nitride (GaN) catalyst could be successfully regenerated with air while maintaining a stable ethylene yield. The DRIFTS experiments confirmed the DFT work that ethylene is formed first followed by benzene formation over gallium in non-oxidative CH4 conversion
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».