Exploring parenting factors as possible predictors and moderators of mothers' cognitive appraisals of the family impact of raising their child with a neurodisability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Families raising a child with a neurodisability face challenges in various areas of their lives due to caregiving demands. When compared to typically-developing children of the same age, children with a neurodisability have multiple needs related to their functional and behavioural challenges. Many parents are nonetheless able to appraise the positive impact of raising their child along with the negative impact. The construct of cognitive appraisal of the family impact of childhood disability refers to parents' subjective interpretation of this phenomenon and serves as the main construct of interest in this study. Given the presence of difficult behaviour and health complexity in children with a neurodisability, whether factors related to mothers' experience of their parenting, such as their parenting behaviours and attributions, could affect their cognitive appraisals of the family impact were assessed. The overall aim of the present study was to learn about the experiences of families with a child with a neurodisability and to gather new knowledge to develop improved intervention for improving family outcomes. The specific research questions were to investigate whether parenting factors were predictive of, and moderated mothers' formation of positive and negative cognitive appraisals of the family impact of caring for their child with a neurodisability. The first set of hypotheses addressed whether certain child (i.e., difficult behaviour and health complexity) and parenting (i.e., parenting behaviours and parent attributions) characteristics predicted the outcome variables, mothers' positive and negative cognitive appraisals of the family impact of child neurodisability. The second set of hypotheses addressed whether the relationship between the child's difficult behaviour and mothers' cognitive appraisals changed (i.e., was moderated) depending on the parenting factors (i.e., parenting behaviours and parent attributions). For example, did the relationship between the child's difficult behaviour and mothers' negative cognitive appraisals change depending on their level of hostile/ineffective parenting behaviour? This study was conducted as a secondary data analysis of the CIHR funded Parenting Matters! study dataset. The sample consisted of 196 Canadian mothers with a child with a neurodisability age 4 to 12 years old, and were recruited from major health centers in Quebec, Ontario and Alberta. The first set of hypotheses were analyzed using two hierarchical multiple regressions, and the second set, via a moderation analysis. The variance in positive cognitive appraisal was predicted by three variables and the relationships were inverse; household income, child's age at diagnosis, and parent attribution of adult control over failure. Child health complexity predicted negative cognitive appraisal and the relationship was direct. None of the parenting behaviour variables nor parenting attribution variables moderated the relationship between the child's difficult behaviour and mothers' negative or positive cognitive appraisals. The findings have increased the knowledge of the factors that contribute to the cognitive appraisal of the family impact of raising a child with a neurodisability. The discussion is focused on explaining the results within a family context, and the implications for families raising a child with a neurodisability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».